Hollow sphere, angular momentum, torque problem? help?

AI Thread Summary
A hollow sphere with a radius of 0.15m and rotational inertia of 0.040 kg m^2 rolls up a 30-degree incline with an initial total kinetic energy of 20J. The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational kinetic energy, using the formulas for rotational inertia and kinetic energy. The confusion arises from combining translational and rotational kinetic energy, specifically how to express the rotational term in relation to the translational term. The key realization is that angular velocity (ω) can be expressed in terms of linear velocity (v), allowing the terms to be combined correctly. Ultimately, the participant resolves the confusion by recognizing the relationship between linear and angular motion.
nchin
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Hollow sphere, angular momentum, torque problem? help??

a hollow sphere or radius 0.15m with rotational inertia = 0.040 kg m^2 about a line through its center of mass, rolls without slipping up a surface inclined 30 degree to the horizontal. at a certain initial position,the sphere's total kinetic energy is 20J.

a) How much of this initial KE is rotational?

what i did

Hollow sphere = 2/3MR^(2)
KErot = 1/2 Iω^2

KEtotal = KEtranslational + KErotational

a) 20 = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2 x 2/3 mr^2
20 = 1/2mv^2 + 1/3 mr^2

this part confuses me
1/2mv^2 + 1/3 mr^2 = 5/6mv^2
20 = 5/6mv^2

How was 1/2mv^2 + 1/3 MR^2 = 5/6mv^2?? mv and MR are different yet how were they both added together??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


When dimensions don't match up, backtrack to the first instance. It's here:
nchin said:
a) 20 = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2 x 2/3 mr^2
ω is missing.
 


haruspex said:
When dimensions don't match up, backtrack to the first instance. It's here:

ω is missing.

1/2mv^2 + 1/2 x 2/3 mr^2ω = 5/6mv^2

ok so if i put a ω there, how would it still = 5/6mv^2? in other words how can you change mr^2ω into mv^2? help!
 


oh nvm i got it. w = V^2/R^2. r cancel out. thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top