- #1
eyenkay
- 7
- 0
Ok, here's the question, have patience with my terrible latex skills...
The equations of constraint of the rolling disk:
dx - asin(theta)d(phi) = 0 -> 1.
dy + acos(theta)d(phi) = 0 -> 2.
are special cases of general linear diff-eqs of constraint of the form:
[tex]\sum[/tex]g_i(x1,...,xn)dxi = 0 -> 3.
A constraint condition of this tupe is holonomic only if an integrating function f(x1,...,xn) can be found that turns it into an exact differential. Clearly the fn. must be such that
[tex]\delta[/tex](fg_i)/[tex]\delta[/tex]x_j = [tex]\delta[/tex](fg_j)/[tex]\delta[/tex]x_i -> 4.
for all i[tex]\neq[/tex]j. Show that no such integrating factor can be found for either of equations 1 or 2.
above
I have found that when I put either equation 1 or 2 into 3, i can cancel the df, and I am left with the original equation, but with the sign backwards (ie 1 becomes dx + ..., and 2 becomes dy - ...). I don't know if this actually means anything...
I am wondering if I can possibly arrange eq 4. so that i have something to integrate, and show that f diverges...? I don't know how to show that there is no such f...
Anybody have any tips or ideas?
Thanks for your time.
Homework Statement
The equations of constraint of the rolling disk:
dx - asin(theta)d(phi) = 0 -> 1.
dy + acos(theta)d(phi) = 0 -> 2.
are special cases of general linear diff-eqs of constraint of the form:
[tex]\sum[/tex]g_i(x1,...,xn)dxi = 0 -> 3.
A constraint condition of this tupe is holonomic only if an integrating function f(x1,...,xn) can be found that turns it into an exact differential. Clearly the fn. must be such that
[tex]\delta[/tex](fg_i)/[tex]\delta[/tex]x_j = [tex]\delta[/tex](fg_j)/[tex]\delta[/tex]x_i -> 4.
for all i[tex]\neq[/tex]j. Show that no such integrating factor can be found for either of equations 1 or 2.
Homework Equations
above
The Attempt at a Solution
I have found that when I put either equation 1 or 2 into 3, i can cancel the df, and I am left with the original equation, but with the sign backwards (ie 1 becomes dx + ..., and 2 becomes dy - ...). I don't know if this actually means anything...
I am wondering if I can possibly arrange eq 4. so that i have something to integrate, and show that f diverges...? I don't know how to show that there is no such f...
Anybody have any tips or ideas?
Thanks for your time.