Homework EquationsThe Attempt at a SolutionDifficult 3D Lie algebra [SOLVED]

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Difficult 3D Lie algebra

Homework Statement



Let \left(\begin{array}{cc} a & b \\ c & d \end{array}\right) \in GL_2(\mathbb{C}).

Consider the Lie algebra \mathfrak{g}_{(a,b,c,d)} with basis {x,y,z} relations given by
[x,y]= ay + cz
[x,z] = by + dz
[y,z] = 0

Show that \mathfrak{g}_{(a,b,c,d)} \cong \mathfrak{g}_{(a',b',c',d')}; \iff \left(\begin{array}{cc} a' & b' \\ c' & d' \end{array}\right) = \lambda g \left(\begin{array}{cc} a & b\\ c & d \end{array}\right) g^{-1}\; \exists \lambda \in \mathbb{C}^\times, g \in GL_2(\mathbb{C})


The Attempt at a Solution



Right now I'm struggling to prove this in either direction so let me start with \implies. Since the Lie algebras are isomorphic (via \psi : \mathfrak{g}_{(a,b,d,c)} \to \mathfrak{g}_{(a',b',c',d')} say), the images of the basis vectors satisfy the commutation relations of \mathfrak{g}_{(a,b,d,c)}, ie

[\psi x,\psi y]= a\psi y + c\psi z
[\psi x,\psi z] = b \psi y + d\psi z
[\psi y,\psi z] = 0

Moreover, \mathfrak{g}_{(a',b'c',d')} has a basis {x',y',z'}, with the following commutation relations

[x',y']= a'y' + c'z'
[x',z'] = b' y' + d' z'
[y',z'] = 0

My plan was to relate one basis to the other using a change of basis matrix (x',y',z')^T = A \cdot (\psi x,\psi y,\psi z)^T. Then plugging each equation for x',y',z' into the commutators in the above commutation relations I hoped to obtain a relationship amongst (a,b,c,d) and (a',b',c',d').

The result was something like

\left(\begin{array}{cc} a' & c' \\ b' & d' \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} y' \\ z'\end{array} \right)= B\left(\begin{array}{c}\psi y\\\psi z\end{array} \right)

where B is a matrix involving a,b,c,d and the entries of A. There is one extra relationship from [y',z'] = 0 which connects a,b,c,d and the entries of A, but I don't know how to use this.


Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could anyone suggest if this is even the correct plan of attack?

I've been thinking about this for hours but am getting nowhere. Somehow I need to find a relationship amongst the matrices (a,b,c,d) and (a',b',c',d') without those column vectors of basis vectors in there.
 
Let the Lie brackets [,] and [,]' work over a common vector space V.

A is invertible then \{ay + cz, by + dz \} is a basis for \mathbb{C}\{y,z\}. Thus \{[x,y],[x,z] \} is a basis so \mathbb{C}\{x,y\} is composed entirely of Lie brackets. This shows that \psi([y,z]) = [\psi y, \psi z].

Define two linear maps \varphi : \mathbb{C}{y,z} \to V ; w \mapsto [x,w] and \varphi' : \mathbb{C}{y,z} \to V ; w \mapsto [\varphi(x),w]. Then the isomorphism condition becomes for the first two commutation relations that

\varphi_{\mathbb{C}\{ a,b \}} \circ \varphi = \varphi' \circ \varphi_{\mathbb{C}}.

The matrix for \varphi is A. If the coefficient of x in \varphi(x) is alpha, say, then the matrix for \varphi' is A', because all commutators of y with z vanish. Thus in terms of matrices we have

g A = \alpha A'g. Which is what we set out to prove.
 
Note that for grad level HW questions, it is okay to post in the non HW sections of PF, where you have more chance of getting a reply.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top