Homework help: discrete schodinger eq. Energy Eigenstates?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a problem from Baym's Lectures on Quantum Mechanics regarding the discrete Schrödinger equation. The main challenges include demonstrating the existence of N linearly independent solutions and finding the normalized energy eigenstates. Participants suggest using Bloch's theorem to approach part (b), which involves expressing solutions as a product of a periodic function and a plane wave. The energy eigenvalues can be derived from the periodic boundary conditions, leading to the conclusion that these values converge to the free particle energies in the continuum limit. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the importance of established quantum mechanics principles.
tiger_striped_cat
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Hello all,

Before I start. You should note:
-I'm not just looking for a solution
-I've been working on this for hours
-I've checked probably about 10 quantum books
-I've scoured the internet
-My professor can't (or won't) help me (and two other students) so I can't ask around. We three are doing harder problems in the class, so there isn't anyone I can turn to.
-We all get full credit regardless on how well we do on these sets.

Here's the problem: Baym's Lectures on Quanum Mechanics Chapter 3, problem 1 (verbatim):

1. In the "discrete" Schrodinger equation (3-12) [which is given by:

i\frac{\partial\psi_{i}(t)}{\partial t}=w_{i,i-1}[\psi_{i,i-1}(t)-\psi_{i}(t)]+w_{i,i+1}[\psi_{i,i+1}-\psi_{i}(t)]+\frac{v_{i}}{\hbar}\psi_{i}(t)

]

for a free particle, w_{i,i-1}=w_{i,i+1}\equiv w, and v_{i} = 0. Assume periodic boundar conditions, that is, \psi_{N+1}(t)=\psi_{1}(t), and generally \psi_{N+j}(t)=\psi_{j}(t), where N is a large integer.
(a) Show that there are N linearly independent solutions of this Schrodinger equation.
(b) Find the N normalized energy eigenstates, that is, those solutions that vary in time with a fixed frequency. What are teh possible energy values for the particle? Show that these go over into the free particle energies, p^2/2m, in the continuum limit, i.e., as \lambda, the size of the intervals \rightarrow0, but N\lambda remains fixed.
(c) We can define the propagator matrix, K, by \psi_{j}(t)=\sum_{k} K_{jk}(t,t')\psi_{k}(t') in analogy with (3-91). [Which is given by:

<r|\Psi(t)> = \int d^3r' K(rt,r't')<r'|\Psi(t')>

Write down an explicit expression for the matrix elements K_{jk}(t,t').


__________
Now, equation 3-12 simplifies to:

i\frac{\partial\psi_{i}(t)}{\partial t}=w[\psi_{i,i-1}(t)+\psi_{i,i+1}-2\psi_{i}(t)].

So I have N coupled differential equations. I think I can argue for part (a) by showing that I have these N equations that form a vector equation. And that the tridiagonal matrix formed by the coefficients of the psi's can be diagonalized. Or agrgue in this vein somehow.

But part (b) is killing me. I've been thinking about it. And if any of you know solid state you might have ran into problems like this before. The problem is that there are N equations. I might be able to deal with diagonalizing a matrix in Mathematica with some known size, but with some general N equations, I'm a little lost. I found a resource that says you can solve the discrete SE using Bloch's Theorem. The explanation was very shotty and I still don't see how to get the energy eigenvalues. And the resource isn't readily available anyways.

If you want to help me out you could try and wikipedia/mathworld/google Bloch's Theorem or "discrete schrodinger equation," but it didn't seem to help much.

Thank you for reading!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone? (this space is for filler because I can't post a one word reply on this forum) :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:
 


Hello there,

I understand your frustration and I will do my best to help you out with this problem. First off, let me say that it's great that you have already checked multiple sources and have put in a lot of effort to solve this problem on your own. That shows dedication and determination, which are great qualities to have in the field of quantum mechanics.

Now, let's tackle the problem. Part (a) is indeed about showing that there are N linearly independent solutions to the discrete Schrodinger equation. This can be done by considering the matrix formed by the coefficients of the psi's, as you mentioned. This matrix is a tridiagonal matrix, as you correctly pointed out, and can be diagonalized. This means that there are N eigenvectors of this matrix, which correspond to the N linearly independent solutions of the Schrodinger equation. This is a valid argument for part (a).

Moving on to part (b), the key here is to use Bloch's theorem. This theorem states that for a system with periodic boundary conditions, the solutions to the Schrodinger equation can be written as a product of a periodic function and a plane wave with a fixed wave vector. In this case, the periodic function is the psi's and the plane wave is e^{ikx}, where k is the wave vector.

Using this, we can write the solutions to the Schrodinger equation as:
\psi_{j}(x,t) = e^{ikx}\phi_{j}(t)
where \phi_{j}(t) is a periodic function with the same period as the potential.

Now, we can substitute this into the Schrodinger equation and we get:
i\frac{\partial\phi_{j}(t)}{\partial t} = w(e^{ik\lambda}+e^{-ik\lambda}-2)\phi_{j}(t)
where \lambda is the size of the intervals (as given in the problem).

Now, we can solve this equation for \phi_{j}(t) and we get:
\phi_{j}(t) = e^{-iE_{j}t}
where E_{j} = 2w(cos(k\lambda)-1). This is the energy eigenvalue corresponding to the jth solution.

Now, to find the normalized energy eigenstates, we need to find the values of k that satisfy the periodic boundary conditions. In other words, we need to find
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top