Homework - Interparticle distance between galaxies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework assignment focused on calculating interparticle distances between galaxies. Participants seek clarification on the formal expression for total galaxy number density and its practical challenges, particularly regarding luminosity and mass distributions. They also inquire about using numerical values for galaxy density and luminosity to estimate inter-galaxy distances. Additionally, there is a request for the expression of the total number of neighbors of a galaxy and how to compute density contrast from this information. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying theoretical concepts to practical astronomical observations.
fab13
Messages
300
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


[/B]
I have the following questions as homeworks and I would like to get help.

Question 1) Give the formal expression of the total number density of galaxies. Why is this expressoin problematic in practice?

Question 2) In practice one uses a numerical value for the number density of galaxies and for their typical luminosity. Explain why and how.

Question 3) Using the above typical values, infer an estimation of ##l_{g}## ,
the inter galaxy distance.

Question 4) Using a powerlaw correlation function, give the formal expression of the total number neighbours of a galaxy.

Question 5) Infer the distance of the inter galaxy distance

Question 6) From the number of neigbours infer the density contrast it represents

Homework Equations

: equations concerned are not provided into this homework[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



Question 1) I saw from my research different expressions for the total density of galaxies (as a function of Luminosity or Mass), but which one could correspond to this question 1 ? What is this formal expression ?

Then, why this total density is problematic ?

Question 2) It seems to be related to the problematic above.

Can I use, for a sample of galaxies ##S##, with ##L## luminosity :

##\Phi_{s}(L) = \dfrac{n_{s}(L)}{V_{s}(L)}## which is the number of galaxies in S per unit luminosity ?

? If yes, why have I got to use ##\Phi_{s}(L)## compared to formula in question 1 ?

Question 3): How can I infer an estimation of inter galaxy distance from expressions into question 1 and question 2 above ?

Question 4): I didn't see the expression of the total number neighbours of a galaxy : anyone could give me help about the expression to apply in this case ?

Question 5): If I knew the formula of question 4, I could compute the average distance between two galaxies

Question 5): I must estimate the number of neighbours of main galaxy up to a distance ##r##and so estimate the density contrast that represents.
I don't see how to estimate this density contrast since I have not the expression asked on question 5.
Sorry if the answers are simple but I am a beginner in galactic and extra-galactic matters.

Even short answers or suggestions could help me to solve these different questions.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fab13 said:
Question 1) I saw from my research different expressions for the total density of galaxies (as a function of Luminosity or Mass), but which one could correspond to this question 1 ? What is this formal expression ?
I am only guessing here, but what you find online will mostly be concerned with estimating the value from observations, whereas "formal expression" sounds like they are asking for a definition.
How would you define the term?
 
@haruspex

I wonder if the expression of this "total density of galaxies" has to imply luminosity distribution or mass distribution. But the clue is that expression has to be problematic from a physical point of view (from what is said in homework).

So if someone could give me indications to find the appropriate relation of "total density of galaxies". Regards
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top