Homology and Homotopy groups from properties

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter heras1985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Properties
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between properties of topological spaces and their corresponding homology and homotopy groups. Participants explore various results and techniques in algebraic topology, including specific examples and methods for computing these groups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that if a space X is contractible, then H_0(X)=\mathbb{Z} and H_n(X)=0 for n≠0, and mentions Eilenberg MacLane spaces K(π,n) with specific properties for their homotopy groups.
  • Another participant suggests that there are many such rules and provides a link to a Wikipedia page on the fundamental class.
  • A third participant emphasizes the difficulty in finding explicit rules despite their abundance.
  • Cellular homology is mentioned as a method for computing the homology groups of CW complexes, along with references to the Seifert-van-Kampen theorem and Mayer-Vietoris sequence as useful tools.
  • A later reply reiterates the request for results related to homology and homotopy groups and suggests that a good introductory book on algebraic topology contains many homology computations, while noting that homotopy is more complex.
  • The concept of rational homotopy for simply connected spaces is introduced, with a mention of using minimal models of rational cohomology as a technique.
  • An exercise is proposed to compute the homology of an arbitrary closed surface.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a shared interest in finding results related to homology and homotopy groups, but there is no consensus on specific rules or techniques, and multiple approaches are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the complexity of homotopy compared to homology, and there are references to specific techniques and theorems that may require further elaboration or assumptions not fully detailed in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in algebraic topology, particularly those looking for methods to compute homology and homotopy groups based on properties of spaces, may find this discussion beneficial.

heras1985
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am looking for results which provides the homology and homotopy groups from some property of the space.
For instance, if a space X is contractible then H_0(X)=\mathbb{Z} and H_n(X)=0 if n\neq 0. Another example is the Eilenberg MacLane spaces K(\pi,n) where \pi_n(K(\pi,n))=\pi and \pi_r(K(\pi,n))=0 if n\neq r. It is also known the result for the homology groups of the spheres.
Do you know some similar result or some book where I can find them?
Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you heard of cellular homology? Readily let's you compute the homology groups of any CW complex.

Other than that, Seifert-van-Kampen and Mayer-Vietoris are your friend.
 
heras1985 said:
I am looking for results which provides the homology and homotopy groups from some property of the space.
For instance, if a space X is contractible then H_0(X)=\mathbb{Z} and H_n(X)=0 if n\neq 0. Another example is the Eilenberg MacLane spaces K(\pi,n) where \pi_n(K(\pi,n))=\pi and \pi_r(K(\pi,n))=0 if n\neq r. It is also known the result for the homology groups of the spheres.
Do you know some similar result or some book where I can find them?
Thank you in advance.

In a good first book on algebraic topology you will find many homology computations.
Homotopy is much harder. Rational homotopy of simply connected spaces can be computed from minimal models of rational cohomology. This is a powerful technique.

A good exercise is to compute the homology of an arbitrary closed surface.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K