How 2 find distance from non uniform velocity time graph where can't use triangle?

AI Thread Summary
To find the distance moved by a trolley with a non-uniform velocity represented on a v-t graph, the area under the curve must be calculated, which corresponds to the distance traveled. The original poster struggled with using triangles and basic kinematic equations to determine this area. Suggestions included approximating the area using rectangles or employing calculus to find an antiderivative for a more precise calculation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of visualizing the graph and breaking it down into simpler geometric shapes for area estimation. Ultimately, understanding the area under the curve is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
*Double post,from merge of 2 posts,sry.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
inv
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hi. *Problem solved.

A trolley of mass 930 g is held on a horizontal surface by means of two springs,one spring on the left and right respectively.The variation with time t of the speed v of the trolley for the first 0.60s of its motion is shown in the fig(It's a v-t graph,max y=8.0cms^-1 ,min x=0.0s & 0.6s) below.

untitled.jpg


Use the fig above to determine the distance moved during the first 0.60s of its motion.

The answer=0.031m +-.001m.I find using a triangle to find half of the distance,then multiply 2 to get the whole distance not satisfying.I used s=ut +at^2/2 also and still didn't get it.Any 1 pls tell of a way to get the ans?


*Edit
 
Last edited:
What is the area under the curve?
 
What is the area under the curve?
 
Im sorry, but I don't understand what your talking about. Its not 'area', it represents something.
 
Last edited:
Im sorry, but I don't understand what your talking about. Its not 'area', it represents something.
 
It's distance,which is represented under the area under the curve,how to find?
 
You approximate the area using rectangles.

If you know calculus then you can calculate the exact area in many cases by finding an antiderivative.
 
You approximate the area using rectangles.

If you know calculus then you can calculate the exact area in many cases by finding an antiderivative.
 
  • #10
Crosson said:
You approximate the area using rectangles.

If you know calculus then you can calculate the exact area in many cases by finding an antiderivative.
There's no equation given for the graph,how?
 
  • #11
Crosson said:
You approximate the area using rectangles.

If you know calculus then you can calculate the exact area in many cases by finding an antiderivative.
There's no equation given for the graph,how?
 
  • #12
Use the geometry of the curve to estimate the area. Do you have a digital camera to snap a picture of the graph?
 
  • #13
Use the geometry of the curve to estimate the area. Do you have a digital camera to snap a picture of the graph?
 
  • #14
A diagram would certinaly be nice!

Can you segment the area under the graph into nice geometric regions? By that I mean triangles and rectangles?
 
  • #15
I've just added the graph pic on the first post,edited.If u 1 ,refer to that 1.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
This thread has been merged with another IDENTICAL question that the OP has cross-posted. So if it appears to make no sense at some spot, it isn't my fault.

Zz.
 
Back
Top