How Accurate Are My Vector Addition Results?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the accuracy of vector addition results for various scenarios. The user seeks confirmation on their answers for three vector problems, with parts b and c being validated as correct. For part a, it is noted that there may be missing information, preventing a proper evaluation. The correct approach for part d involves considering the north and south components separately before adding the westward vector. The importance of including both magnitude and direction in vector results is emphasized throughout the conversation.
MoreZitiPlease
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
a.
2cm N + cm W

b. 5m S+ 8cm N

c. 30m/s W+ 50m/s S

d. 5cm N + 7cm W +9cm S


My answers:

a.7.2
b.9.43
c.58
d.?

I want to know if a,b, and c are right; I don't know d.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, b and c are correct...I don't know what is a) and for part d) consider the N and S alone, and the "add'' to the W
 
Remember that a vector always has both magnitude and direction, so the answer to any vector addition is a vector. An answer that gives only the magnitude is incorrect, unless only the magnitude is asked for.

(a) seems to have something missing, so we can't do that one.

For (b), we have 5m S = -5m N so the sum is

-5m N + 0.08m N = -4.92m N = 4.92m S

For (c) we need to add things as vectors. This gives a resultant vector with magnitude

\sqrt{30^2 + 50^2) = 58.3

The relevant angle from the south direction is

\tan^{-1}(\frac{30}{50}) = 31^\circ

So the full answer is

58.3\text{~m/s S~}31^\circ\text{W}
 
How did you get b?
 
MoreZitiPlease said:
How did you get b?

A vector x in the south direction is equivalent to a vector -x in the north direction.
 
a= 2cm N + 7cm W
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top