How Accurate Is Our Estimation of the World’s Ocean Mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the mass of water in the world's oceans, starting with the assumption that two-thirds of the Earth's surface is ocean. The calculations involve using the Earth's radius and the density of seawater, leading to an estimated mass of seawater around 2.1 x 10^21 kg. Participants clarify that the two-thirds figure refers to the surface area, not the total volume of the Earth, and suggest incorporating the average depth of the ocean for accuracy. Overall, the calculations are deemed reasonable, with minor adjustments needed for radius and density. Accurate estimations of ocean mass require careful consideration of surface area and depth.
hasan_researc
Messages
166
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Estimate the mass of water in all the World’s oceans."


Homework Equations



I know the following:
Two-thirds of the Earth is sea.
The density of seawater is 1025 kg/m3.
Radius of the Earth = 6.3*106m.


The Attempt at a Solution



Let's assume that the Earth's crust is a spherical shell that has a thickness of 0.001 times the radius of the earth.
So, the volume of the crust = (4\pir2)(router-rinner) = 3.1*1018 m3.
So, volume of seawater = 2.1*1018 m3.
So, mass of seawater = 2.1*1021 kg.

Is the answer reasonable? How might I improve it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no no, ~2/3 of the SURFACE of the Earth is ocean. much much less of the entire Earth is ocean. I'd recommend using the average depth of the ocean, and the surface area of the earth.
 
"no no, ~2/3 of the SURFACE of the Earth is ocean. much much less of the entire Earth is ocean.": I am reading the 'surface' as the crust (or the outer layer) of the earth. I think that's what I have used in the calculation, not ~2/3 of the entire volume of the earth.

" I'd recommend using the average depth of the ocean, and the surface area of the earth. ":
I think that's what I did above.

I'd be glad if you could offer some genuine help.
 
hasan_researc said:
I'd be glad if you could offer some genuine help.
Very sorry! I took, "Two-thirds of the Earth is sea" to mean that you thought that 'two-thirds of the Earth was sea.' I clearly should have known you meant something completely different.

Your numbers look good; your radius is a little big, but your density a little small (for sea-water), you should be within a factor of two.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top