How are cubic equations converted into this form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter autodidude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Form
autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
y = a(x-b)^3 + c

I'm not sure what it's called, my book doesn't mention on how it's derived.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, not all cubic equations can be converted into this form. For example, x3+4x2+3x+1 can only be converted into (x+1)3+x2, and unless you let c be non-constant, it can't be put into the form you're looking for.
 
I guess it would be called "completing the cube" like "completing the square".

But to be able to "complete the square" you must be given coefficients of x^2 and x while to "complete the cube" you would have to be given coefficients of x^3, x^2, and x. And, as Char.Limit said, unlike completing the square, if those coefficients are not related correctly, it will be impossible. Which is probably why there is not standard name for the operation!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top