A How are energy levels and De-Broglie wavelengths related in the Bohr model?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter blackdranzer
  • Start date Start date
blackdranzer
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
From the Bohr/De Broglie postulate we have n λ = 2πr where λ is the De-Broglie wavelength , r is the radius corresponding to n and n is the quantum number.

  1. An electron in the state n=2 has more energy than that at n=1
  2. That implies that the De- Broglie wavelength associated with the electron should also decrease ?
From the postulate..it is the other way i.e. the wavelength increases as the electron gains energy. How is this possible?.( I had assumed that wavelength decreases with energy)

if we calculate the De-Broglie wavelengths from the postulate:

for n=1 ; λ = 33 * 10^-11 m

for n=2 ; λ = 66 * 10^-11 m

does this mean that as the energy of the electron increases the corresponding De-Broglie wavelength increases?! may be i am missing something very basic here.

semiclassical
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blackdranzer said:
does this mean that as the energy of the electron increases the corresponding De-Broglie wavelength increases?! may be i am missing something very basic here.

Bohr's condition, that the angular momentum is an integer multiple of h/2.pi was later reinterpreted in 1924 by de Broglie as a standing wave condition: the electron is described by a wave and a whole number of wavelengths must fit along the circumference of the electron's orbit:

however the atom model is bound state model and in each orbit the particles total energy must be negative (sum of KE + PE) and the lowest orbit is the deepest and slowly it goes towards zero ...i.e. the particle becomes free.
say for hydrogen atom the ionization energy is 13.6 ev .
so the ground state n=1 is at -13.6 eV. so higher states will be closer to zero and the number will be smaller...
so how one can see it ...
say -13.6 eV is larger or smaller than -10 eV ?
one has to supply +3.6 eV to the electron to raise it to -10 eV.
and if an emission has taken place by transfer of electron from say E2 to E1 then E2 - E1 =h.frequencyAn electron in the lowest energy level of hydrogen (n = 1) therefore has about 13.6 eV less energy than a motionless electron infinitely far from the nucleus. The next energy level (n = 2) is −3.4 eV. The third (n = 3) is −1.51 eV, and so on. For larger values of n, these are also the binding energies of a highly excited atom with one electron in a large circular orbit around the rest of the atom.
see wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_model#Origin> for detail discussion
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top