How Are Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Related in Quantum Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The Hamiltonian operates over time, while the Lagrangian focuses on the trajectory of a particle, indicating a fundamental difference in their roles in mechanics. The Hamiltonian is indeed an operator representing the total energy of a system, and its relationship to the Lagrangian is established through a Legendre Transformation in classical mechanics. The Lagrangian density, which is crucial in field theory, differs from the Lagrangian as it depends on field values and their spatial derivatives rather than just configurations and velocities. This distinction highlights the transition from particle mechanics to field theory, where the Lagrangian density serves as a volume-based representation of the Lagrangian. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the connections between Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations in quantum mechanics.
TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5
"The hamiltonian runs over the time axis while the lagrangian runs over the trajectory of the moving particle, the t'-axis."
What does the above statement means? Isnt hamiltonian just an operator that corresponds to total energy of a system? How is hamiltonian related to lagrangian intuitively?

Besides what is lagrangian density intuitively and mathematically? Is it equal to lagrangian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the future, it's best to provide a reference to a quote so that folks can easily look at the source and context of the quote.
I had to do a Google search and guessed this was the source.

Concerning the statement of the quote...
The interpretation doesn't seem to be a standard interpretation... but it seems interesting and might be worthy of further study.
I can't say I understand enough of that interpretation to give a summary of the idea. (Do a search for ... hans de vries largrangian ).

Since you refer to the Hamiltonian as an operator, your context seems to be quantum mechanics or quantum field theory, which appears to be the context of the quote. (See Ch 22 of the document that comes up in the Google search.)

In classical mechanics, the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian are related by a Legendre Transformation.
I don't have yet an "intuitive" explanation of that relationship... beyond saying it's an important transformation of variables. (part of a backburner project)

While the largrangian is used in particle mechanics (with few degrees of freedom),
the Lagrangian density is used in field theory (with many more degrees of freedom).
Rather than being a function of configurations and velocities,
it is a function of the field values and their derivatives in some region of space.
Crudely speaking, the Lagrangian density is in some sense the Lagrangian-per-unit-volume.

Possibly useful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top