How are negative ions created in an experiment with a balloon and wool?

AI Thread Summary
Negative ions are created in the balloon and wool experiment through the transfer of electrons during friction. When the balloon is rubbed against the wool, energy is applied, causing electrons to escape from one material, resulting in positive ions. Conversely, the balloon gains extra electrons, leading to the formation of negative ions. This occurs because polar materials can create a weak dipole field that facilitates the addition of electrons, while conductors allow excess charges to move freely. The choice of rubber balloons and wool is due to their specific properties that enable effective electron transfer.
Goodver
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
In a famous experiment with a balloon and wool.

http://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/...atest/balloons-and-static-electricity_en.html

Initially the balloon and wool pullover have no ions.

I understand how positive ions are formed, that you apply energy to the electron, thus electron overcomes the attracted force created by a proton, but how are the negative ions created?

I assume when we rub the balloon with a wool pullover we apply energy to both materials, thus depending on a material (how tight electrons to the nucleus) electrons are escaped from both materials forming positive ions.

BUT, I don't understand how the negative ions created, why would atom which is in equilibrium get more electrons and why at the end we get 2 charged materials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For positive ions, an electron or more is stripped off.

So to make negative ions, one or more electrons are added.

These electrons need not be associated with a particular atom; for polar materials there is a weak dipole field available to do the pulling/repelling. For a conductor the extra charges just "float about" or are taken from the "electron sea" of conduction electrons.

Rubber balloons and wool sweaters were chosen for a reason: they have the properties required to hang onto or loose electrons.

There is a good presentation at: http://www.regentsprep.org/Regents/physics/phys03/atribo/default.htm
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top