How Are the Failures of Equipartition Theory Linked to Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The failures of equipartition theory and the Rayleigh-Jeans radiation law are linked through the quantization of energy states in quantum mechanics. Equipartition theory incorrectly predicts that the specific heat of gases remains constant regardless of temperature, contradicting experimental findings. The Rayleigh-Jeans law, derived from classical assumptions, also fails to match experimental results due to similar quantization effects. In quantum mechanics, the behavior of angular momentum and energy contributions changes, leading to a temperature dependence that differs from classical predictions. Ultimately, both failures highlight the limitations of classical physics in explaining phenomena at the quantum level.
neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
The law of equipartion of energy requires that specific heat of gases be independent of the temperature,in disagreement with the experiments.It also leads to Rayleigh-Jeans radiation law,which is also in disagreement with the experiment.What is the relation between the two failures?

What I understand,in both cases,we must take the \ h\nu\frac{1}{e^(h\nu/kT)-1} whereas the classical equipartition theory assumes kT
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Plesae bear with the bad LaTeX output.
 
Hey, no one interested!
 
I'm not an expert on the subject, but from what I understand, both failures are due to quantization of energy states. The Rayleigh-Jeans law, if I remember correctly, can be derived by realizing that the inside of a blackbody is like an infinite square well and taking into account rules about how an ensemble of bosons behaves.

An ideal gas should have a specific heat of 6/2 kB classically speaking, and this shouldn't be dependent on temperature. The reason is that the average of something that contributes quadratically to the total energy (i.e., 1/2 m v^2_x, 1/2 I \omega^2, 1/2 k x^2, etc.) is always 1/2 kB T. However, in quantum mechanics, the angular momentum contribution to the kinetic energy no longer has the form specified above. I forget what the form is exactly, it's somewhat complicated, but the important part is that, while the average of the classical angular momentum contribution is proportional to T, the average of the quantum mechanical angular momentum contribution is proportional to something else, probably T^4 (yielding a T^3 dependence for the specific heat).

So, to sum it all up, the quantization of energy states in an infinite square well is responsible for the Rayleigh-Jeans law, and the quantization of angular momentum is responsible for the temperature dependence of the specific heat.
 
I thank you for your reply.But it would be better if you clarify your write up a bit more.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top