How Are the Masses of Binary Stars Calculated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zvaigzdute
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binary Stars
AI Thread Summary
About half of visible stars are binary systems, with two stars orbiting a common center of mass. In a specific binary star system, one star has a circular orbit radius of 7e11 m and the other 10e11 m, completing a revolution in 49 years. The masses of the stars can be calculated using the formula G*m1*m2/(r1+r2)=m1r1(2pi/T)^2. A participant in the discussion is struggling with calculations and suspects a potential error in squaring the sum of the orbital radii. Accurate mass determination is crucial for understanding stellar properties in astrophysics.
Zvaigzdute
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a) About half of the visible "stars" are actually binary star systems, two stars that orbit each other with no other objects nearby. Consider the motion of the center of mass of a binary star system. For a particular binary star system, telescopic observations repeated over many years show that one of the stars (whose unknown mass we'll call M1) has a circular orbit with radius R1 = 7 ee11 m, while the other star (whose unknown mass we'll call M2) has a circular orbit of radius R2 = 10e11 m about the same point. Make a sketch of the orbits, and show the positions of the two stars on these orbits at some instant. Label the two stars as to which is which, and label their orbital radii. Indicate on your sketch the location of the center of mass of the system. (Do this on paper; you will not be asked to turn it in. )
(c) This double star system is observed to complete one revolution in 49 years. What are the masses of the two stars? (For comparison, the distance from Sun to Earth is about 1.5 1011 m, and the mass of the Sun is about 2 1030 kg.) This method is often used to determine the masses of stars. The mass of a star largely determines many of the other properties of a star, which is why astrophysicists need a method for measuring the mass.

Homework Equations



G*m1*m2/(r1+r2)=m1r1(2pi/T)^2


The Attempt at a Solution



m2=(r1+r2)^2(r1)(2pi/t)^2

I plugged all the numbers in but got the wrong answer is there something I am doing wrong?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could it be that you just forgot to square (r1 + r2) ?
Perhaps a calculation error? If you show your calc, someone will check it for you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top