How are the physics departments at UC Santa Cruz and UC Davis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter renob
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights insights into the physics departments at UC Santa Cruz and UC Davis, with a focus on UC Santa Cruz. The program is noted for its strong research opportunities, particularly in astronomy, with Stan Woosley as a prominent faculty member. However, there are concerns regarding the quality of teaching, as one former student found most professors lacking in effective presentation skills for undergraduates, despite being kind and patient. The curriculum requires physics majors to submit a thesis for graduation, and classes typically have 40-50 students, with all grading being curved. The Science & Engineering library is praised for its excellent resources.
renob
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
UC Santa cruz/Davis?

Does anyone have any insight/comments about the physics departments at UC Santa Cruz or UC Davis?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
Santa Cruz has an excellent program. Especially if you're interested in astronomy as well - Stan Woosley teaches there.
 
Everyone always says that the physics program is great, but I think that must have more to do with the research that goes on there. I was an astrophysics undergrad there up until last spring, and I was unimpressed with the teaching of all but one of my professors.

All of the professors I've come into contact with are kind and patient, but I got the distinct impression that many had little idea of how to present information to undergrads. The school is devoted to offering research opportunities to undergrads. All grading was curved in all of my classes. Upper div classes had about 40-50 students. The Science & Engineering library has excellent resources. I don't know if this is the norm, but all physics majors must submit a thesis in order to graduate.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top