How are the Real Numbers distributed?

HyperbolicMan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Question: What is the probability that a random variable X with domain all real numbers will take a value in the closed interval [a,b]?

It seems to me that in order to answer this question you have to know how the real numbers are distributed. Given the appropriate distribution function, you can integrate it from a to b to find the probability.

Common sense says that the real numbers should have a constant distribution (e.g. P(x)=c for all x). However, the integral of any constant function from -\infty to \infty is not 1.

So how exactly are the real numbers distributed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am pretty sure that for any finite numbers a and b, the chance that x is in [a,b] is zero.

For any finite number a, the chance that x is in [a,infinity) is 50%. The same with (-infinity,a]
 
HyperbolicMan said:
So how exactly are the real numbers distributed?
They are distributed how you want them to be. A set does not have an intrinsic distribution. For instance you may define a probability density function p(t) by p(t) = 1/2 for t in [1,3] and p(t)=0 otherwise.

If what you want is a uniform distribution, then no such thing can exist on the real numbers for the reason you mentioned (that if p(x) =c for all x, then \int_{-\infty}^\infty p(x) dx is 0 or \infty depending on whether c =0 or c>0, but never 1).
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top