How are these two equal?(equation, inequality)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pithikos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Pithikos
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
How are these two equal??(equation, inequality)

I study discrete mathematics and we are doing combinations at the moment. There is this example in the book(Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics p. 30 Ex. 1.43) where it states that the number of integer solutions for:

x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6<10 where xi\geq0

is equal to the number of integer solutions of

x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7=10 where xi\geq0 and x7>0

Can someone explain me this? The author supposes that I magically understand what goes through his mind.

Here is a screenshot of the problem: http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/823/garbageab.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


This is subtle, but, trivial: Try to see that to all the possbile solutions of x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6<10, we can add a positive number and make it equal to 10 and also that it is only the set of these solutions to which we can add a positive number and make it equal to 10; thus the set of integer solutions of both equations have the same number of elements.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top