How can a star turn into a black hole, with the law of conservation of mass?

AI Thread Summary
A star can turn into a black hole when it collapses, with some mass being expelled during a nova event, while the remaining mass may form the black hole if it is sufficiently large. Black holes have a mass that is equal to or less than the original star, and from a distance, they behave similarly to stars or planets. The gravitational effects of a black hole become significant only when one approaches it closely, due to the inverse square law of gravity. Mass loss occurs during black hole formation, with energy being released as electromagnetic radiation and gravitational waves, maintaining the total mass-energy balance. Ultimately, the concept of conservation of mass can be understood through the lens of mass-energy equivalence, as mass can be transformed into energy.
ilikefun411
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
where does all the mass go?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Black holes have a mass that is the same or less then the mass of the star that collapsed into the black hole. If there is a nova event connected to the collapase, most of the mass will be scattered into space, if the remaining mass is large enough then it will collapase into a black hole.
 
It should be noted that black stars don't have an immense gravitational field. From far away, a black hole acts just like a star, or a planet. It's only when you get really close to a black hole that the gravity starts acting strange... because gravity is proportional to the distance from the center of an object squared, if you're, say, standing on the surface of the earth, you're 4,000 miles from the center of the earth. A black hole with the mass of earth, however, may have a radius of 4 miles. So if you're 10,000,000 miles away from earth, it has the same gravitational pull as if you're 10,000,000 miles away from the black hole. But if you're 1 mile above the surface of the earth, you're 4001 miles away from the center. If you're 1 mile above the surface of the black hole with the same mass, you're 5 miles from the center
 
ilikefun411 said:
where does all the mass go?
I haven't heard of "conservation of mass", only conservation of energy. But, since mass = energy (e=mc2) I guess it could be called either.(?)

A BH can form from several methods; direct collapse of a massive star, large core remaining from a Type II supernova, merger of two massive bodies etc. Any BH formation mechanism causes some mass loss and since mass = energy, some "mass loss" is carried away as EM radiation, gravitational radiation and sometimes conversion of angular momentum.

So, mass/energy will actually remain at the same total, just not all as "particles of matter".
 
for conservation of mass, replace energy with mass in the law of conservation of energy. it's the same thing, like you said.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top