How Can Angular Momentum Principles Solve Ice Skater and Rotating Disk Problems?

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum principles are essential for solving problems involving rotating systems, such as ice skaters and disks. In the first problem, the angular speed of the skaters can be determined using conservation of angular momentum, treating them as point masses. The second problem involves two disks where the final common rotational speed and the fraction of kinetic energy lost to friction can also be found using angular momentum conservation. For the third problem, the angular speed of the rod changes as the beads slide to the ends and can be analyzed with the same conservation principles. Understanding these concepts simplifies the approach to solving such rotational dynamics problems.
jcumby
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am having a lot of trouble understanding this! I'm not even sure how to begin these :(

First problem:
Two ice skaters, both of mass 60 kg, approach on parallel paths 1.4 m apart. Both are moving at 3.2 m/s with their arms outstretched. They join hands as they pass, still maintaining their 1.4 m separation, and begin rotating about one another. What is their angular speed?

I think that this has to do with moment of inertia and the distance from the axis of rotation, but I am confused.

Second problem:
Two disks, one above the other, are on a frictionless shaft. The lower disk, of mass 440 g and radius 3.4 cm is rotating at 180 rpm. The upper disk, of mass 270 g and radius 2.3 cm, is initially not rotating. It drops freely down the shaft onto the lower disk, and frictional forces act to bring the two disks to a common rotational speed. a.) what is that speed? b.) what fraction of the initial kinetic energy is lost to friction?

I think that I should be using energy considerations here, but I'm not sure how I should set this up.

Third problem:
Two small beads of mass m are free to slide on a frictionless rod of mass M and length l. Initially, the beads are held together at the rod center, and the rod is spinning freely with initial angular speed \omega0 about a vertical axis. The beads are released, and they slide to the ends of the rod and then off. Find the expressions for the angular speed of the rod a.) when the beads are halfway to the ends of the rod b.) when they're at the ends, and c.) after the beads are gone.

I believe that I should treat the beads as point masses, but I am confused about where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jcumby! :smile:

(have an omega: ω :wink:)

i] Don't bother about moment of inertia … you can treat them both as point masses.

Use conservation of angular momentum … the angular momentum before they touch is the same as the angular momentum when they're turning.

ii] Part a): You don't need energy, only conservation of angular momentum, = ∑ Iω.

Part b): Rotational KE = ∑ (1/2)Iω2.

iii] Yes, point masses again.

And use conservation of angular momentum again (the radial speed of the beads doesn't matter, since it doesn't contribute to angular momentum :wink:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top