How Can College Students Master the Math Behind Kalman Filters?

uglyoldbob
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have been doing some reading on Kalman filters trying to figure where to start. I have done some college level calculus, but clearly I don't currently know enough to understand the math involved. Where is a good place for me to start? I downloaded a copy of the linear algebra book by Jim Hefferon. I haven't read a whole lot of the book, but I feel pretty confident with the topics covered in it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Between linear algebra and Calculus that should be enough to understand the Kalman filter.
 
Every place explaining the kalman filter seems to use completely different variable names which makes it difficult for me to understand.
You have the measured state and the actual state. Then there is a state transition model, a control input model, process noise, and observation noise.
Measured state and actual state are easy. What do those others mean? Are there "standard" variable names for these?
Anybody know where I can find some good explanations for the kalman filter?
 
John Creighto said:
Between linear algebra and Calculus that should be enough to understand the Kalman filter.
I strongly disagree. Without a good understanding of probability and statistics the linear algebra and calculus will just look like a bunch of stuff pulled out of thin air.

uglyoldbob said:
Anybody know where I can find some good explanations for the kalman filter?
Here's a free one, "An Introduction to the Kalman Filter," by Welch and Bishop.
http://www.cs.unc.edu/~tracker/media/pdf/SIGGRAPH2001_CoursePack_08.pdf

The book "Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering" by Brown and Hwang isn't free, but is very very good.
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471128392.html

Both delve extensively into probability and statistics before introducing the filtering concepts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top