How Can Different Image Quality Metrics Be Rescaled for Uniform Comparison?

  • Thread starter Thread starter richterallen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scaling
richterallen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi to all,

my problem is the following:
I have different different quality metrics which are able to assess image quality by investigating several parameters in an image.
The problem with those metrics is their scale. Some of them range from 1 to 10 (10-highest quality) some of them from 0 to 1, etc.

I want to figure out how well those metrics correlate with assessments done by human subjects who judged the images on a scale from 1 - 5. how can I compare between the various scales? how can I rescale the mathematic metrics so that all of them range from 1 to 5? (so i can compare it to human judgement).

Thanks a lot in advance

Allen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
first, fix a universal metric (which is a term i just made up) that has a set range: 0-10 or 0-1 or 1-5. just pick one and then make the others conform to that via a formula that converts 0-10 to 1-5. these are all linear formulas of the form y=mx+b where x is the old scale and y is the new scale.

the case of transforming 0-10 to 1-5 or vice versa would go like this:
two points are (0,1) and (10,5). (first scale first coordinates--second scale second coordinates)

the slope is (5-1)/(10-0)=4/10=.4.
the y-intercept is 1 (this is because we're given the point (0,1)).

so the transformation is y=.4x+1.

for example, a 2 on the 1-10 scale is a .4(2)+1=1.8 on the 1-5 scale.
a 10 on the 0-10 scale is a .4(10)+1=5 of the 1-5 scale.

etc.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Back
Top