How can I construct the 4D real representation of SU(2)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The construction of the 4D real representation of SU(2) involves the rotation around the x-axis, represented by the matrix U(x) = e^{ixT_1}. The 4x4 matrix is derived from the complex representation of SU(2) by treating the real and imaginary parts of each complex number as two separate real numbers. However, the expected form of the 4x4 matrix, which separates real and imaginary components into distinct submatrices, is incorrect. The correct approach involves applying U to a vector in the form of (a, b, c, d)^T, and recognizing that the resulting matrices do not satisfy the SU(2) algebra due to the presence of factors of i and i^2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SU(2) group theory
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their representation in matrices
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics and spin representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the spin 3/2 representation of SU(2) in detail
  • Learn about the action of J_± and J_z on quantum states
  • Explore the implications of complex numbers in matrix representations
  • Investigate the algebraic properties of SU(2) and its generators
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians specializing in group theory, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek to understand the representation of SU(2) and its applications in quantum states.

Dilatino
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
An element of SU(2), such as for example the rotation around the x-axis generated by the first Pauli matrice can be written as

<br /> U(x) = e^{ixT_1} = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \cos\frac{x}{2} &amp; i\sin\frac{x}{2} \\<br /> i\sin\frac{x}{2} &amp; \cos\frac{x}{2} \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br /> =<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> c &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -s \\<br /> 0 &amp; c &amp; s &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -s &amp; c &amp; 0 \\<br /> s &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; c \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

I assume that here c = \cos\frac{x}{2} and s = \sin\frac{x}{2}.The last 4 by 4 matrice is said to be constructed by treating the real and complex parts of each complex number as two real numbers. However, when doing this I would rather have expected that each complex number in the 2 by 2 matrice is expanded into its own 2 by 2 matrice, such that the resulting 4 by 4 matrice would schematically look like

<br /> U(x) =<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> Re(U_{11}) &amp; Im(U_{11}) &amp; Re(U_{12}) &amp; Im(U_{12}) \\<br /> Im(U_{11}) &amp; Re(U_{11}) &amp; Im(U_{12}) &amp; Re(U_{12}) \\<br /> Re(U_{21}) &amp; Im(U_{21}) &amp; Re(U_{22}) &amp; Im(U_{22}) \\<br /> Im(U_{21}) &amp; Re(U_{21}) &amp; Im(U_{11}) &amp; Re(U_{22}) \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

But this is obviously not how the 4 by 4 matrice is constructed. What am I missing or misunderstanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you want to let ##U## act on
$$ U \begin{pmatrix} a+ib \\ c+ id \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} a'+ib' \\ c'+ id' \end{pmatrix}$$
and then rewrite this as a 4x4 matrix acting on ##(a~b~c~d)^T##. The reason that ##U_{4\times 4}## does not take the 2nd form you wrote is because of the factors of ##i## and ##i^2##.

Note that this doesn't actually give what we would call a representation of the group, because, if we do the same mapping on the generators (Pauli matrices), the image matrices don't satisfy the SU(2) algebra. If you really want the 4-dimensional representation, then a good way to work it out is by noting that it is the spin 3/2 representation. Then we know how the ##J_\pm, J_z## act on the states ##|3/2,m\rangle## and we can work out appropriate matrices for them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K