How can I design a 30-second lag time timer using a 555 timer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter big_tobacco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Timer
AI Thread Summary
To design a 30-second lag time timer using a 555 timer, configure it in monostable mode, possibly using a 556 timer for added functionality. Trigger the timer with a momentary switch connected to a 6V supply, which will initiate a 30-second delay before activating an LED for 10 seconds. For larger loads, consider using a time-delay relay or a microcontroller for more complex control. Participants suggest that while 555 timers are simple, using software-based solutions might be more efficient for certain applications. The user plans to experiment with these suggestions on a breadboard soon.
big_tobacco
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Please could you help me with this problem;

I need to design a timer whereby I briefly trigger it (using a push to make/push to break switch connected to a 6 v supply), there is a pause of 30 seconds and then it triggers with an output, say an LED - this stayes on for about 10 seconds then automatically extinguishes, after it has extinguished it then shuts off. It's only until I trigger the PTM/PTB switch again that the sequence begins all over.

Please, please help...I was hoping to possibly use a 555 timer(s) or something very simple.

Hope you can help :cry:

Regards
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Push to make/push to break? I assume you mean a single pole single throw momentary switch?
-
If so, I would use 555 timers, or a single 556. Configure them monostable. Make one time out at 30 seconds, the other at 40 seconds. Hook the LED between the outputs, or buffered outputs.
 
Welcome to PF big_tobacco. I agree with Averagesupernova in using a couple of 555s or a 556 to generate your pulses but if you have any kind of large load to consider, you might want to use a
http://www.factorymation.com/s.nl;jsessionid=0a010c491f434401fa96817849d4a900c5c8249efc4a.e3eSc3aPaxmLe34Pa38Ta38NaNb0?sc=2&category=100" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe something from the Microchip http://www.microchip.com/ParamChartSearch/chart.aspx?branchID=1009&mid=10&lang=en&pageId=74" families?

The ATMEL equivalent is the http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/devices.asp?family_id=607#791" family.

They *are* simple--it's just that it's simple software instead of simple hardware.

EDIT: But yeah, if you have any kind of large load, go with the time-delay relay as dlgoff recommends. On the other hand, depending on what sort of expertise you have, you *could* drive a triac or relay.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brilliant, thank you very much for your help. I think this weekend I'll crack out the bread-board and give these a try!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top