How can I diagonize this n×n matrix Hamiltonian?

  • Thread starter Thread starter qubitor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
qubitor
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


sorry for my english..

I was asked to find a base to diagonize a Hamiltonian, which could been written in the given base as below:

n×n matrix

0 1 0 0 0 ... 0 0
1 0 1 0 0 ... 0 0
0 1 0 1 0 ... 0 0
0 0 1 0 1 ... 0 0
... ... ... ... ...
0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 ... 1 0


Homework Equations


In order to diagonize this Hamiltonian, I think one could calculate its eigenvalues in this base to get
eigenfuntions, hence one can use matrix of eigenfunctions to tranforms this base to obtain a new base which diagonize Hamiltonian as
λ1 0 ... 0
0 λ2 ... 0
...
0 ... λn


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to calculate the determinant to obtain eignenvalues of Hamiltonian by
det|λId - H|=0
But it is too complicated and I didn't find a way to calculate it in n dimensions. Is there some way that I didn't know to calculate the determinant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is there someone could make it?
 
You could try expressing H as ##H_{ij} = \delta_{i (j-1)}+\delta_{i (j+1)}##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top