How can I efficiently build a boomilever using only wood and glue?

  • Thread starter Thread starter backdoor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Build
AI Thread Summary
To efficiently build a boomilever using only wood and glue, focus on creating a strong yet lightweight structure that adheres to the specified dimensions and material restrictions. Utilize gussets to enhance stability and consider the strategic placement of dowels to maximize load-bearing capacity without exceeding the 1/4 inch diameter limit. Research existing designs and techniques to gather insights on effective construction methods. Pay attention to the attachment base dimensions, ensuring it is securely mounted and compliant with the project guidelines. Experiment with different glue types to find the best bond for your materials, as this will impact the overall efficiency and strength of the boomilever.
backdoor
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am a high school student and for a class projecI have to build a boomilever. Except for the atachment base I can only use wood and glue. Any type of glue can be used. Inculding gussets, it must be constructed of wood no longer than 1/4 inch high and 1/4 inch wide in cross-section. If dowels are used, they may not have a diameter greater than 1/4 inch. There is no limit on the length of idividual wood pieces used in the construction.The entire attachment base may not exceed 30cm x 20cm 1/2 inch thick and permanently attached to boomilever. When mounted to the testing wall no part the of the attachment base may extend farther than 1/2 inch from the wall.

I would greatly appreciate help/tips on building this boomilever, this is my first time and i will be graded on efficiency.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
First, do a quick search. There have been a few threads already on this topic. See where that takes you and then come back with more questions.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top