How can I find the distance a car travels when the brakes are applied?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BuBbLeS01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Track
AI Thread Summary
To determine the distance a car travels when brakes are applied, the discussion focuses on applying kinematic equations and understanding unit conversions. The car, weighing 12000 N and initially moving at 57 km/hr, is brought to a stop in 2.6 seconds. Participants emphasize the importance of using consistent units, converting velocity to meters per second, and correctly calculating acceleration. After several calculations, the correct force needed to stop the car is found to be approximately 7456.8 N, and the distance traveled during braking is derived using the appropriate kinematic formulas. The conversation highlights the need for careful attention to detail in physics calculations.
BuBbLeS01
Messages
602
Reaction score
0
Question:
A. A car that weighs 12000.0 N is initially moving at a speed of 57.0 km/hr when the brakes are applied and the car is brought to a stop in 2.6 s. Find the magnitude of the force that stops the car, assuming it is constant.

B. What distance does the car move during this time?

Okay so I drew the diagram and I am planning on using the f=ma equation but I think I need to solve for a first using Vf=Vo + at. Am I on the right track or am I completely off??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you're on the right track.
 
Okay so I did...
(57 km/hr)^2 = a x (2.6s)
and I got 1249.6 m/s^2...which way wrong...where am I going wrong?
 
Last edited:
Wait I wrote that backwards sorry...

I got...

0 = (57 km/hr)^2 +a(2.6s)
 
BuBbLeS01 said:
Wait I wrote that backwards sorry...

I got...

0 = (57 km/hr)^2 +a(2.6s)

Why are you squaring 57?
 
Why are you squaring the velocity? And you've got to be consistent with your units...you can't have seconds on one side of the equation and hours on the other without introducing a conversion factor.
 
oh my gosh I don't know why I am squaring it...I am looking at the wrong equation. Okay I changed 57 km/hr to 0.01583 km/s. Now I have...
0 = 0.01583 km/s + a (2.6s)...
(-0.01583 km/s) / (2.6s) = a

so now I can use f=ma
f= (12000.0 N) x (0.0060897 km/s^2)
 
BuBbLeS01 said:
oh my gosh I don't know why I am squaring it...I am looking at the wrong equation. Okay I changed 57 km/hr to 0.01583 km/s. Now I have...
0 = 0.01583 km/s + a (2.6s)...
(-0.01583 km/s) / (2.6s) = a

so now I can use f=ma
f= (12000.0 N) x (0.0060897 km/s^2)

careful... you should use m/s for velocity and m/s^2 for acceleration (because your force equation requires kg for mass and m/s^2 for acceleration... to get the result in N)...

and also 12000.0N isn't the mass, it's the weight... get the mass of the object.
 
learningphysics said:
careful... you should use m/s for velocity and m/s^2 for acceleration (because your force equation requires kg for mass and m/s^2 for acceleration... to get the result in N)...

and also 12000.0N isn't the mass, it's the weight... get the mass of the object.
okay so this is what I have now...

0=15.83 m/s + a x (2.6s)
(-15.83m/s) / (2.6s) = a = (-6.08846)

w=mg
12000/9.8=1224.49

f=ma
1224.49 * -6.08846 = -7455.26 N
That is really big!
 
  • #10
BuBbLeS01 said:
okay so this is what I have now...

0=15.83 m/s + a x (2.6s)
(-15.83m/s) / (2.6s) = a = (-6.08846)

w=mg
12000/9.8=1224.49

f=ma
1224.49 * -6.08846 = -7455.26 N
That is really big!

Looks good. That's the right answer.
 
  • #11
learningphysics said:
Looks good. That's the right answer.
It says its incorrect...I don't know what is wrong.
 
  • #12
BuBbLeS01 said:
It says its incorrect...I don't know what is wrong.

I don't think you carried enough decimal places... I get -7456.8N
 
  • #13
learningphysics said:
I don't think you carried enough decimal places... I get -7456.8N
should I be entering it as positive since its the magnitude?
 
  • #14
BuBbLeS01 said:
should I be entering it as positive since its the magnitude?

Yes! I didn't notice that it asked for magnitude!
 
  • #15
learningphysics said:
Yes! I didn't notice that it asked for magnitude!
Yay it's right! Hehe...Thank you so much for your time! I really do appreciate it!
 
  • #16
BuBbLeS01 said:
Yay it's right! Hehe...Thank you so much for your time! I really do appreciate it!

no prob.
 
  • #17
How do I start the second part of this question?
 
  • #18
Hey,

If I remember right I believe you should use the displacement function,

<br /> {x}(t) = {x}_{0} + {v}_{x_{0}}{t} + \frac{1}{2}{a}_{x}{t}^{2}<br />

I think that should work.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
  • #19
Thats what I used but it says incorrect?
I put...

Xt = 0 + (57 km/hr) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(21.9km/s^2)(2.6s^2)
 
  • #20
BuBbLeS01 said:
Thats what I used but it says incorrect?
I put...

Xt = 0 + (57 km/hr) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(21.9km/s^2)(2.6s^2)

don't mix up your units... do everything in m, s, m/s, m/s^2
 
  • #21
For the acceleration I have a formula of (Vf-Vo)/t...that doesn't seem right...is it?
 
  • #22
BuBbLeS01 said:
For the acceleration I have a formula of (Vf-Vo)/t...that doesn't seem right...is it?

It is right, but you need to use the right units... you can't use km/hr then use seconds for time... use m/s for velocity... convert the velocity to m/s.

units must be consistent.
 
  • #23
Oops! here we go..

Xt = 0 + (15.83 m/s) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(7.92m/s^2)(2.6s^2)

and its still saying my answer is wrong :(
 
  • #24
BuBbLeS01 said:
Oops! here we go..

Xt = 0 + (15.83 m/s) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(7.92m/s^2)(2.6s^2)

and its still saying my answer is wrong :(

where are you getting the 7.92? 7.92 is not 15.83/2.6. Also acceleration is negative.
 
  • #25
Oh my gosh I divided by 2 instead of 2.6! My answer is still wrong though. I got 33.24 mXt = 0 + (15.83 m/s) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(-6.088m/s^2)(2.6s^2)
 
  • #26
BuBbLeS01 said:
Oh my gosh I divided by 2 instead of 2.6! My answer is still wrong though. I got 33.24 m


Xt = 0 + (15.83 m/s) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(-6.088m/s^2)(2.6s^2)

you didn't do (2.6)^2... it's (1/2)at^2...

There's another formula you can also use to get the distance... it doesn't have acceleration in it. Check your answer both ways and compare them...
 
Back
Top