How can I find the range of the function ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nanas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Range
AI Thread Summary
To find the range of a function, one method involves computing its inverse, but caution is needed as algebraic manipulation can alter the domain. For example, the function f(x) = (e^x - e^(-x))/2 has a well-defined inverse, allowing its range to be determined from the domain of the inverse. Conversely, the function g(x) = √(x + 2) - 1 requires domain restriction to ensure its inverse is one-to-one, leading to a range of [-1, ∞). Calculus can also assist in determining the range by finding critical points and analyzing monotonicity. Overall, understanding both algebraic and calculus methods is essential for accurately determining function ranges.
Nanas
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
how can I find the range of the function ??

I don't know a method to get the range of any function without the graph. But all I can say that for some functions I can get its range by first computing the inverse of the function , and this is the problem itself because in sometimes when computing the inverse the steps are not reversible,and thus the domain of the produced function is not the the same as the rage of the function, because we have extraneous solutions,and the produce function is not one-to-one,then we should know the range of the function in order to restrict the domain of the produced function.I will put examples



f(x) = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}

After computing the inverse we have,

f^{-1} (x) = ln(x+\sqrt{x^2 +1})

since our steps are reversible then these functions are invertible in order to check that directly from the definition after checking we have,

f(f^{-1} (x) ) = x for all x in the domain of f^{-1}
f^{-1} (f (x)) = x for all x in the domain of f (x)

and we also note that f^{-1} is one to one.
and thus we can know the range of f(x) directly from the domain of its inverse ,that,s because the domain of the inverse is the range of the function as if we tried to compute the inverse of the inverse we will have the the function back with the same domain and thus its rage equal the domain.(is my reasoning and concept is correct??)

Another example

g(x) = \sqrt{x+2} -1

I know it is easy to know the range of this function by applying transformations to sqrt(x)
But let's assume you don't know the range of g(x), then computing inverse
g^{-1} (x) = x^2 +2x -1
here is the problem we know when we computed the inverse we are possibly suppose extraneous solutions for y,and we note also that the inverse of g is not one to one, and thus can't be returned back to g ,so we must restrict the domain of g inverse , in order to be invertible, during my course in Algebra , we used to restrict this domain according to the range of g which is [-1 , infinity) but I assumed that we don't know this range.here I will go through the definition.we must have
g (g^{-1} (x) )= x for all x in the domain of g^{-1}
we know that,
g (g^{-1} (x) )= x if x\geq -1

g (g^{-1} (x) )= -x if x < -1

then ,
g (g^{-1} (x) )= x if and only if x\geq -1
then we restrict the domain of g inverse (-1, infinty) and because -1 is the x- coordinate of the vertex of g inverse so we have checked that g inverse is one-to-one
we also check, after checking

g(g^{-1} (x) ) = x for all x in the domain of g^{-1}
g^{-1} (g (x)) = x for all x in the domain of g (x)

so arguing as before we have the range of g (x) is [-1 , infinity )

so is these methods true, is my concept is correct ??

and thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Your general idea looks good. But you have to be careful, sometimes algebraic manipulation can alter the domain, which you have to take into account. Consider: f(x) = \frac{x^2 -1}{x-1}.

Do you know any calculus? Since the function is continuous you can just find the critical points which is often easier

f(x) = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}

f’(x) = \frac{e^x + e^{-x}}{2}, which has no zeros, so the function is monotonic, so you only have to consider infinity and negative infinity
 
Last edited:


Yes I know Calculus But I began learning it from only a week and I understand what you mean . Thanks for helping me
 


Nanas said:
Yes I know Calculus But I began learning it from only a week

Do you know what critical points are?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top