How can I find the shape of an orbit under an inverse cube law of force?

bushdayroses
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

I've found the a general form of equation for the explicit integration of the shape, r(\theta), of a one-body-problem (a particle rotating about a set point, O) for arbitrary \mathbf{f} = -f(r)\hat{\mathbf{r}}, and used it to find r(\theta) for an inverse square law f(r) = \mu / r^2. Where u = (1/r).

I was able to get r = r(\theta(t)) => \dot{r} = {{dr} \over {d\theta}} {{d\theta} \over {dt}} = {{dr} \over {d\theta}} \left({{h_0} \over {r^2}}\right)

Where h_0 \neq 0 is the constant angular momentum.

Can anyone help me to figure out the shape under an inverse cube law of force, f(r) = {{\nu} / {r^3}}, and show that if \nu \le h^2, the orbit is unbounded?

I know that this solution will depend on the relative sizes of \nu and h, but I can't seem to get this to work.EDIT:: Got LaTex to work
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One way to approach this problem is to use the substitution

r=\frac{1}{u}\mbox{ and u =}\frac{1}{r}

then differentiate r with respect to t giving

\dot{r}=-\frac{1}{u^2}\frac{du}{d\theta}\frac{d\theta}{dt}

and

\dot{\theta}=\frac{L}{mr^2}

This will give

\dot{r}=-\frac{L}{m}\frac{\mbox{d}u}{\mbox{d}\theta}

Differentiate again with respect to t to find the second derivative of r in terms of u and theta. Write the general equation of motion for r in terms of F(r) and "centrigugal" force (L2/(mr3), and substitue the second derivative of r with respect to t. You will arrive at an equation of motion in terms of u and theta. This differential equation is easier to solve than straightforward methods. Once u is found substitue 1/r and solve for r.
 
Got it figured out. Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top