How can I integrate e^-x sinx using parts?

AI Thread Summary
To integrate the function ∫ e^(-x) sin(x) dx using integration by parts, it is necessary to apply the method twice due to the infinite number of successive differentials of both e^(-x) and sin(x). After two applications, the sine function will recur, allowing for simplification by combining terms and dividing by 2. An alternative method involves using complex numbers, specifically the imaginary part of e^((-1 + i)x), which leads to a more straightforward solution. This method results in the expression -1/2 e^(-x)(sin(x) + cos(x)) + c, showcasing a connection to Laplace transformations. The discussion highlights both the traditional integration by parts approach and the efficiency of the complex variable method.
misogynisticfeminist
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
I've got a function \int e^{-x}sinx dx

From what I know, only functions which has one or more products with a finite number of successive differentials can be evaluated using integration by parts. Because for \int v duin our choice of du, we want to cut down on the number of times we have to evaluate it using integration by parts again.

Since both e^{-x} and sinx have infinite nos. of successive differentials, how do i evaluate that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to integrate by parts TWICE, after which the Sin() will recur and can be combined with the original Sin() on the same side of the equation. Divide both sides by 2 to arrive at your answer.

~~
 
Last edited:
hey, i didn't saw that, thanks alot...
 
There is a much neater way to integrate the function. Hint : What is the imaginary part of e^{(-1 + i)x} ?

EDIT : Nevermind, here's the whole solution since it's only an extra (but "cool" method). z is the constant of integration, with c being the imaginary part of the constant.

\int e^{-x}\sin x dx = Im(\int e^{(-1 + i)x} dx) = Im(\frac{1}{-1 + i}e^{(-1 + i)x} + z)

which can be further simplified to -\frac{1}{2}e^{-x}(\sin x + \cos x) + c
 
Last edited:
I would normally second the complex variable method (since it goes nicely in the theory of Laplace transformations),but the exarcise required part integration,which of course,requires in turn less mathematical knowledge...

Daniel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top