How can i know that this equation is a ellipse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fabio010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipse
Fabio010
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Sketch the following region:

| z+i | + | z-1 | =2




I know that it is a ellipse, but i am trying to replace the z for x +iy.



I reached the following equation.

3x^2+3y^2 = 4x-4y+2xy


now how can a simplify it in order to have the ellipse equation: (x^2/a^2) + (y^2/b^2) = 1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Supposing you have done this correctly:

1. There is no reason that the axes of the ellipse should lie parallell to the x and y-axes.
That this is NOT the case, is given by the mixed quadratic term 2xy.
You need to rotate your coordinate system by some fixed angle "a", by introducing new, general coordinates (u,v), for example:
x=u*cos(a)-v*sin(a), y=u*sin(a)+v*cos(a)
We then determine the angle "a" so that the cross term in "u" and "v" vanishes.
Here, "a" is the angle between the positive x-axis and the positive u-axis, so that if "a"=0 yields x=u, y=v, while "a"=pi/2 in radians, x=-v and y=u.

2. Furthermore: The origin of the ellipse will NOT lie at the origin. Complete the squares in u and v to get (after a while) an equation of the form:
(u-u')^2/K^2+(v-v')^2/L^2=1

where u', v', K and L are constants to be determined.
 
Last edited:
Now, following 1, you'll get:
3(u^2+v^2)=4(u(cos(a)-sin(a))-v(cos(a)+sin(a)))+2((u^2-v^2)cos(a)sin(a)+uv(cos(2a)).

Choosing a=pi/4, then, yields:
3(u^2+v^2)=-4sqrt(2)*v+u^2-v^2, that is:
2u^2+4(v^2+sqrt(2)v)=0

Now, you need to complete the square in v, according to 2.

This gives you:
2u^2+4(v+1/sqrt(2))^2=2,

That is:
u^2/K^2+(v+1/sqrt(2))^2/L^2=1, (**)
where u'=0, v'=-1/sqrt(2), K=1, L=1/sqrt(2)

(**) is your equation for the ellipse, where the u-axis makes pi/4 radians angle to the x-axis

The origin of the ellipse is therefore at (u',v')=(0,-1/sqrt(2)), which works out to be at (x',y')=(1/2,-1/2)

In order to draw it, you ought to find the extremals along the (u,v) axis pairs, and then work out the (x,y) coordinate pairs.
For example,
(u,v)=(0,0) works out as..(x,y)=(0,0)
 
Last edited:
The geometric definition of 'ellipse' is "a plane figure having two points, called foci, such that the total distances from any point on the ellipse to the two foci is a constant".

In the complex plane, geometrically, |a- b| is the distance between point a and point b.

so |z+ i|+ |z- 1|= 2 says exactly that the total distance from any point, z, on the figure to -i and 1, is a constant, 2. That tells us it is an ellipse, having -i and 1 as foci.
 
People thanks for the help!

The problem is not supposed to be that hard.

My teacher just said that it was an ellipse. I tried to prove it by the equation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top