How can I normalize a plot by the cross-section in particle physics?

v0id19
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question--long story short, I need to normalise a plot by the cross-section, but I'm not sure how to do that and the Google hasn't been too helpful.
I was thinking about scaling it by the cross-section times the luminosity--does this sound reasonable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just so I have this straight -- you have a histogram in some parameter x (where x is some scattering angle or energy or something), so that the total area under the curve is the total number of events. You would like the total area under the curve to be the (total) cross-section. Is that right?

In that case, you would just divide by the luminosity, not the luminosity times the cross section. The reason is that, assuming perfect efficiency and so on, we have,

N = sigma*L

where N is the number of events, sigma is the cross-section, and L is the luminosity. Scaling the curve by sigma*L would therefore scale it by N, which would normalize your histogram to unity. If instead you want to normalize it to sigma, just divide by L.

I hope that makes sense and is what you are looking for.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top