B How can I perform decimal computation by hand?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computation hand
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I have to perform the following computation by hand to get a number within two decimal places:
##\displaystyle (120)(\frac{54.30}{194.79})##. The answer is 33.45, but how can I do this by hand?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:
I have to perform the following computation by hand to get a number within two decimal places:
##\displaystyle (120)(\frac{54.30}{194.79})##. The answer is 33.45, but how can I do this by hand?
Well, the multiplication part should be easy enough. It's the long division which takes a bit more effort.

Remember, $$a ⋅ \frac{b}{c} = \frac{a ⋅ b}{c}$$

Don't tell me you've never done any arithmetic by hand.
 
multiply top and bottom by 1 ie 100/100 to get 120 * 5430/19479

next use long division

You could first multiply the numerator by 120 before you divide
 
Okay, so doing the long division ##\frac{651600}{19479}## I can get to 33, but then I have the remainder ##\frac{8793}{19479}##. How can I figure out that this remainder is approximately 0.45?
 
Have you forgotten how to do long division?

Here's an example image:

LongDivision.gif
 
Here's some video tutorials to help you:





and there are more here:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28928849/Webpages/ArithmeticVideoLibraryTable.htm

from mathispower4u.com
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top