How Can I Predict Output Current in a Transistor Using Base Current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oneamp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amp Transistor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around predicting output current in a transistor based on base current, exploring the relationship between base current and collector-emitter current in bipolar junction transistors (BJTs). Participants examine the implications of varying hfe values, biasing methods, and the use of feedback in amplifier design.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes confusion regarding the absence of a nominal hfe value in the datasheet, highlighting the significant difference between maximum and minimum hfe values.
  • Another participant emphasizes that relying on a specific hfe value is poor design practice and suggests thinking of BJTs as voltage amplifiers rather than solely current amplifiers.
  • It is proposed that using an emitter resistor can help achieve reliable amplification, with a simplified example provided to illustrate voltage gain.
  • A later reply asserts that while transistors can amplify signals, the method described by the original poster is not effective, suggesting alternative approaches like current mirrors and transimpedance amplifiers for current gain.
  • Participants discuss the importance of feedback in amplifier design, noting that it leads to better behavior at the cost of some gain loss.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reliability of using transistors for amplification. While some assert that transistors can be used effectively for amplification, others caution against the original method proposed, indicating a lack of consensus on the best approach to achieve desired output current from base current.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the variability of hfe and the implications for circuit design, as well as the need for proper biasing techniques and feedback mechanisms, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

oneamp
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
From what I've read about transistors, I thought that I could find the hfe value in the data sheet, then apply a current to base and have the emmitter-collector throughput at a level of base*hfe. It sounded simple, and I was going to have a few different resistors for controlling base current, selected by a switch.

Well, I was confused off the bat, when looking at the data sheet. There was no 'nominal hfe'. There was a max hfe, a minimum hfe, and they were very different values. So how can I do what I wanted to do... know the output current via the base current? It sounds like I'm missing a general principle.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hfe (or beta) varies wildly. The manufacturer will typically guarantee a minimum hfe but it is VERY bad design style to make a circuit that depends on a particular value of hfe.

Also, while physically the BJT is driven by base current, in practice it is more useful to think about it as a voltage amplifier with Ic exponentially related to Vbe via the diode equation.

Your idea for biasing the transistors would be almost impossible to make work because your transistors would slam themselves into saturation. Read this informative link for information on the proper way to bias a discrete BJT.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electronic/npncebias.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you. So, we cannot reliably use a transistor to amplify a signal to a desired value? It's just always an on/off switch in operation?
 
You can use a transistor to reliably amplify a value. One way is to use an emitter resistor. Assume for a moment that Vbe is constant and an NPN transistor. You have 10 ohms in the emitter( to ground) and 1000 ohms in the collector (to Vcc). If you apply a signal to the base it will appear across the 10 ohm resistor causing a current to flow. This current will mostly come through the 1000 ohm resistor so there will be 100 times the voltage drop across the 1000 ohm resistor as across the 10 ohm resistor. There you have inversion and voltage gain. This is extremely oversimplified.

If you want reliable current gain there are ways to do that also.
 
oneamp said:
Thank you. So, we cannot reliably use a transistor to amplify a signal to a desired value? It's just always an on/off switch in operation?

Of course you can use a transistor to reliably use a transistor to amplify a signal. It's how I make my living. But you can't do it in the way you described.

MeBigGuy is right and gave a simple way to get voltage gain. The gain in the structure he suggested is the ratio between the collector or emitter resistors.

If you need current gain, you should use a current mirror. Look that up in wikipedia. If you need high current gain, you should look at a transimpedance amplifier using a op amp.
 
Thanks
 
The point about using any amplifying device (linear and not just a switch) is that you should always use it with feedback, defined by the surrounding components. You end up with a well behaved amplifier at the expense of some loss of gain. But, hey, your average transistor, these days, has loads of gain to spare. It's not like in the old days when they had an Hfe of 10! (and I don't mean Factorial :wink:)
 
sophiecentaur said:
The point about using any amplifying device (linear and not just a switch) is that you should always use it with feedback, defined by the surrounding components. You end up with a well behaved amplifier at the expense of some loss of gain. But, hey, your average transistor, these days, has loads of gain to spare. It's not like in the old days when they had an Hfe of 10! (and I don't mean Factorial :wink:)

Some day I'm going to really learn about transistors.
Today is not that day.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
68
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K