How Can I Quickly Find the Period of a Trigonometric Function Without Graphing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Somefantastik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Period
Somefantastik
Messages
226
Reaction score
0
x = (2/5)cos(t) + (1/5)sin(t)

by graphing this, I found the period to be 2*pi.

My concern is, when taking an exam I won't have time to bother with graphing or I'll get slammed with a weird graph and panic and get stuck.

I'm pretty sure there is a way to find the period quickly without graphing? I am running into this problem in my dyamical systems class and my calculus and trig are sooooooooo rusty.

Thanks,
Candio
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The function is made out of two parts, added together. What is the period of the first part? What is the period of the second part? What is the least common multiple of that (e.g. if the period for one is 3 and for the other one 4, then it will be 12; but if it is 3 and 6 then it will be 6).
 
Ha! Thanks. You're the best :)

lets see

period 2/5.cos(t) = 2pi
1/5.sin(t) = 2pi

least common multiple = 2pi

sweet
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top