How can I relate four formulas from special relativity to find a solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OneEye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
OneEye
[SOLVED] Need help with derivation

I have four formulas from SR, and need to relate them. Two are the Lorentz Transform, one is a simple formula for velocity, and the fourth is the formula for the addition of velocity in SR.

1... x^\prime = { x-vt \over \sqrt { 1-{v^2 \over c^2} } } \quad 2... t^\prime = { { t-{v \over c^2 } x } \over \sqrt { 1-{v^2 \over c^2 } } } \quad 3... x^\prime = wt^\prime \quad 4... W={ v+w \over 1+{vw \over c^2 } }

Dr. Einstein says:

Relativity, page 39:

In the equation x'=wt' we must then express x' and t' in terms of x and t, making use of the first and fourth equations of the Lorentz transformation [equations (1) and (2), above)]. Instead of W=v+w, we then obtain the equation [(4) above].

(Hope that made sense.)

I have tried this, and got here:

w = { x^\prime \over t^\prime }

\Rightarrow w = { { x-vt \over \sqrt { 1- { v^2 \over c^2 } } } \over { { t - { v \over c^2 } x } \over \sqrt { 1- { v^2 \over c^2 } } }

\Rightarrow w = { x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }

...so then...

W=v+{ x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }

...and that's as far as I got. I am quite a ways away from equation (4), above.

Can anyone help me here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
OneEye said:
I have four formulas from SR, and need to relate them. Two are the Lorentz Transform, one is a simple formula for velocity, and the fourth is the formula for the addition of velocity in SR.

1... x^\prime = { x-vt \over \sqrt { 1-{v^2 \over c^2} } } \quad 2... t^\prime = { { t-{v \over c^2 } x } \over \sqrt { 1-{v^2 \over c^2 } } } \quad 3... x^\prime = wt^\prime \quad 4... W={ v+w \over 1+{vw \over c^2 } }

Dr. Einstein says:



(Hope that made sense.)

I have tried this, and got here:

w = { x^\prime \over t^\prime }

\Rightarrow w = { { x-vt \over \sqrt { 1- { v^2 \over c^2 } } } \over { { t - { v \over c^2 } x } \over \sqrt { 1- { v^2 \over c^2 } } }

\Rightarrow w = { x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }

...so then...

W=v+{ x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }

...and that's as far as I got. I am quite a ways away from equation (4), above.

Can anyone help me here?

Yeah, as he said W is NOT v+w. Instead W is x/t. So continuing from
w = { x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }
divide the top and bottom by t
w = { \frac{x}{t}-v \over 1 - { v \over c^2 } \frac{x}{t} }
w = { W-v \over 1 - { Wv \over c^2 } }
Solve for W and you will get
W = { w+v \over 1 + { wv \over c^2 } }
 
DW,

Thanks for a quick and thorough response. I was kind of afraid to go there, because it seems to me that there is a pun here between v=x/t and W=x/t.

Clearly both are true in SOME sense, and it is also clear that v<>W (though in the abstract, W is a kind of v).

Do you think that you can spare me another moment and clear that up for me?

Thanks!
 
OneEye said:
DW,

Thanks for a quick and thorough response. I was kind of afraid to go there, because it seems to me that there is a pun here between v=x/t and W=x/t.

Clearly both are true in SOME sense, and it is also clear that v<>W (though in the abstract, W is a kind of v).

Do you think that you can spare me another moment and clear that up for me?

Thanks!

In this context, v is not x/t. W is. There are three velocities being related. There is w which is the velocity of some "thing" according to measurements made from the primed coodinate system. There is W which is the velocity of that same "thing" according to measurements made from the unprimed coordinate system. And then there is v which is the speed of one of the coordinate systems according to measurements made from the other.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top