MHB How can I show b^2 > 24c in a cubic with one maximum and one minimum?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that for the cubic curve y = 8x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d, the condition b^2 > 24c holds true when there are two distinct points where the gradient is zero, indicating one maximum and one minimum. The gradient is represented by the derivative y' = 24x^2 + 2bx + c, which is a second-order polynomial. It is established that for two roots to exist, the discriminant must be greater than zero, leading to the inequality 4b^2 > 96c. The participant initially misinterpreted the coefficients but later clarified the correct relationship. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of understanding the discriminant in establishing the condition for the cubic function.
camrocker
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, been thinking on this one for a little while, and can't seem to figure it out. Problem statement is:

The cubic curve y = 8x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d has two distinct points P and Q, where the gradient is zero.

Show that b^2 > 24c.

It seems simple enough, but I can't logic it out. This equation has two distinct points where gradient is zero, so one maximum and one minimum, right? I played around with an online graphing calculator and saw that b^2 > 24c for two points of zero gradient is in fact true, but don't see how to mathematically prove/show this.

What direction should I be taking to show that b^2 > 24c? Thanks for any tips!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The gradient of the curve $$y = 8x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$$ is $$y' = 24x^2 + 2bx + c$$

Since it is a second order polynomial it has two roots when the discriminant $\Delta$ is $>0$.

$$\Delta>0 \Rightarrow 4b^2-4 \cdot 24 c>0 \Rightarrow 4b^2>4 \cdot 24c \Rightarrow b^2>24c$$
 
mathmari said:
The gradient of the curve $$y = 8x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$$ is $$y' = 24x^2 + 2bx + c$$

Since it is a second order polynomial it has two roots when the discriminant $\Delta$ is $>0$.

$$\Delta>0 \Rightarrow 4b^2-4 \cdot 24 c>0 \Rightarrow 4b^2>4 \cdot 24c \Rightarrow b^2>24c$$

Thank you so much! I finally got to the discriminant point some time after posting this, but I tossed it aside because I forgot that b was 2b not just b, so I got b^2 > 96c. Thanks for the help!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top