How can I simplify this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SJB
  • Start date Start date
SJB
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to look at my problem.

I'm following a worked example in a textbook and I have come to a line of simplification which I just can't see how/what they've done? I've attached a .jpg showing the two lines of simplification.

Making this simplification helps with integration later on but that's not relevant to this...

Any help would be much appreciated!

Thanks

Simon
 

Attachments

  • equation.jpg
    equation.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 447
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(L-x)=L\left(1-\frac{x}{L}\right)=L\left(2-\frac{x}{L}-1\right)=L\left(2\left(1-\frac{x}{2L}\right)-1\right)
 
Hello Gerenuk,

Brilliant... Thank you very much indeed, I'd spent all day banging my head on the desk over this. I kept trying to expand everything out and group back together again which was pretty stupid I guess...

Thank you again for your help

Simon
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top