How can I solve this Work Energy Theorem problem for finding height?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a Work Energy Theorem problem to find the height of a truck's ascent. The initial approach using mgh = delta k was incorrect due to constant speed resulting in zero change in kinetic energy. The correct method involves considering the work done by non-conservative forces like friction and applying the equation Wfriction = ΔKE + ΔPE. After adjustments, the height was calculated to be 6.28m, confirming the solution. Additionally, the calculation of instantaneous power delivered by the truck was discussed, with the final power output being approximately 169,082.13 W.
TheRedDevil18
Messages
406
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I do not know how to find the height. I am thinking of using mgh=delta k but I am not getting the correct answer. I know the answer is 6.28m because my teacher gave it to me.
Below is the picture and question:
2hcm8uh.jpg


Homework Equations


mgh = delta k

The Attempt at a Solution


ep=ek
mgh=785000
98000h=785000
h = 8.01m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheRedDevil18 said:
I do not know how to find the height. I am thinking of using mgh=delta k but I am not getting the correct answer.
Since the truck moves at constant speed, ΔKE = 0. So that won't work.

Instead, consider the work done by the engine and where that work goes.
 
Take truck as the system. What force acts during its ascension ? How many are non conservative ? What is work done by non conservative force ?

Negative work done by non conservative force= Change in truck's total mechanical energy.
 
sankalpmittal said:
Take truck as the system. What force acts during its ascension ? How many are non conservative ? What is work done by non conservative force ?

Negative work done by non conservative force= Change in truck's total mechanical energy.

The non conservative force will be the friction right? so if I set up the equation it will be like this
-85000=k1+u1
 
TheRedDevil18 said:
The non conservative force will be the friction right? so if I set up the equation it will be like this
-85000=k1+u1

I should have told you to take truck+earth as the system to account for external forces.

Yes. Now total change in mechanical energy is change in kinetic energy plus change in potential energy. As change in kinetic energy is zero, so what is the change in potential energy? It will be better to account for minus sign to gravity.
 
mgh, Cant work it out, need the height.
 
TheRedDevil18 said:
mgh, Cant work it out, need the height.

Wfriction = M.Ef-M.Ei

M.E. is mechanical energy..

Wfriction = ΔK.E + ΔP.E.

As ΔK.E=0 , so

ΔPE=mgh

Now you know, Wfriction= -85000 J.. Can you work it out from here ?
 
TheRedDevil18 said:
mgh, Cant work it out, need the height.
The height is what you are supposed to find! Just call it h and you will solve for it.
 
Okay I think I got the answer:
Fapp-Ffric=mgh
7*10^5-8.5*10^4=10000*9.8*h
h = 6.28m

Correct?
 
  • #10
TheRedDevil18 said:
Okay I think I got the answer:
Fapp-Ffric=mgh
7*10^5-8.5*10^4=10000*9.8*h
h = 6.28m

Correct?
Yes, correct. (Where Fapp is the work done by the applied force, the engine in this case. Better to call it Wapp, right? And the work done against friction would be Wfric.)
 
  • #11
Yeah, sorry its work not force. Anyway,for 3.2 what do they mean by the instantaneous power delivered by the truck. I know P=w/t and I got the time to be 4.14s using t=d/s but what should I use for work, must I subtract Wapp-Wfrict and put it into the equation?
 
  • #12
TheRedDevil18 said:
Anyway,for 3.2 what do they mean by the instantaneous power delivered by the truck. I know P=w/t and I got the time to be 4.14s using t=d/s
Good.
but what should I use for work, must I subtract Wapp-Wfrict and put it into the equation?
To find the power delivered by the engine, just use the work done by the engine.
 
  • #13
Okay so,
p=w/t
= 7*10^5/4.14
= 169082.13 W

Correct?
 
  • #14
TheRedDevil18 said:
Okay so,
p=w/t
= 7*10^5/4.14
= 169082.13 W

Correct?
Good. (I suggest rounding off your final answer and using exponential notation.)
 
  • #15
Will do, and thanks for your help
 
Back
Top