How can I uncouple this system when m1 ≠ m2? ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter juan carlos trujillo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around uncoupling a system of equations where the masses m1 and m2 are unequal. Participants suggest various methods, including the general linear approach and Fourier transformation, to achieve decoupling. One effective strategy involves assuming solutions in the form of oscillatory functions, which leads to algebraic equations for angular frequencies. The conversation emphasizes that finding a suitable combination of variables can simplify the problem, allowing for the identification of normal modes. Ultimately, the focus is on applying mathematical techniques to solve the system effectively.
juan carlos trujillo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
HW Template missing as it was moved from another forum
this is the exercise :

i've got by modes:
img537.png


https://scontent.fbog2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t35.0-12/15311417_1271935189529554_1902854011_o.jpg?oh=09710fddf04ae58a465238d8f1786189&oe=58424904

but i can't uncouple it.

this is supposed to in the form x = -w2 *x i would like if you can help me to solve this problem.
 

Attachments

  • 20161201_124117.jpg
    20161201_124117.jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 501
  • 20161201_124117.jpg
    20161201_124117.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 499
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try the general linear approach ##u=x_1 + c x_2## with some constant c? Ideally, two values for c give (different) uncoupled equations.
 
No, I haven't. Because i really don't know that eqauation.

what i have tried is when applying the sum and substraction (x1+x2) and (x1-x2) as well as the tecnique C1/C2. But none of them gives the frecuency i need due to the masses that are differents and at the end i ended up with nothing because of I got to a point where i couldn't simplify anything.

i've heard a possible solution for this problem could be done by solving through Fourier transform.But i don't know how to apply it .
 
Physics and mathematics are not about memorizing equations. It is about figuring out how to solve a problem.

The sum and differences don't allow to decouple the system, as you noted already.

Fourier transformation should work as well. Just transform the equations.

Guessing a solution and then figuring out the constants is another option: for each mass it will be the sum of two oscillations.
 
  • Like
Likes juan carlos trujillo
juan carlos trujillo said:
Because i really don't know that eqauation.
mfb's suggsted method is quite straightforward. The idea is that there is some point between the masses, maybe not the common mass centre but some other weighted combination of the x values, which satisfies a simpler equation.
If you define u as in post #2 you can get an equation for ##\ddot u## in terms of the x's and c. If you simply assume that expression can be rewritten as some constant times u you can get an equation for c interms of k and the two masses.
By the way, the algebra will be simpler if you first replace k/m1 by k1, similarly k2.
 
juan carlos trujillo said:
this is the exercise :

i've got by modes:
img537.png
but i can't uncouple it.

this is supposed to in the form x = -w2 *xi would like if you can help me to solve this problem.
The usual procedure to solve such problems is to assume the solution in the form x1=aeiωt and x2=beiωt. Substituting into the system of differential equations, you get an algebraic equation for the angular frequency ω. There will be two possible frequencies, and according to them, two possible "normal modes" -two dimensional vectors with components x1 and x2.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top