Frictional Forces: Find Max F for No Slippage of m1 on m2

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhaos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks, where one block (m1) is placed on top of another block (m2) on a frictionless surface. The problem focuses on determining the maximum horizontal force (F) that can be applied to block 2 without causing block 1 to slip, considering the coefficient of static friction between the two blocks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the forces acting on both blocks and question the validity of their reasoning regarding the equations used to relate the forces and accelerations. They discuss the implications of different approaches to solving for F and express confusion about the complexity of the resulting expressions.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the reasoning behind the equations and the relationships between the blocks. Some participants have confirmed their understanding of the equations, while others are still exploring the implications of slipping and the use of different coefficients of friction.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the distinction between static and kinetic friction coefficients when considering scenarios where block 1 may slip. There is also mention of the need to account for different accelerations of the blocks when slipping occurs.

zhaos
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I am studying for an exam and changed a practice problem by putting the force on the bottom block (you'll see). I just wanted to check if my thinking is correct.

Homework Statement


Two blocks sit on top of each other, block 1 (m1) on top of block 2 (m2), on a frictionless surface. There is friction between the two blocks, coefficient of static friction mu. If a horizontal force, F, is applied to the block 2, what is the greatest magnitude of F that can be applied such that block 1 does not slip?

Homework Equations


Sum of forces = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


We mainly need to concern ourselves with the horizontal physics.
Is it valid that I consider the forces on block 2 and the forces on block 1?
Block 2: F - m1 * g * mu = m2 * a
Block 1: m1 * g * mu = m1 * a
Also, F = (m1 + m2)a

So then, I used equations for block 1 and block 2, to solve for F. I got F = g * mu (m1 + m2). Looks like F = (m1 + m2)a isn't very useful.

Is this the right reasoning and the right answer?

Perhaps the weird thing for me is that let's say I use the equation for block 2 and the equation F = (m1 + m2)a. If I substitute in (m1 + m2)a for F, then I can solve for a and get g * mu. If I substitute F / (m1+m2) for a, and solve for F, I get a much more complex expression [m1 * g * mu (m1 + m2)] / (m1 + 2*m2). I wonder if this is the same? It works out dimensionally, but not numerically if I choose random values for m1 and m2. What did I do wrong?

update again: oh oh. no I guess it's right, I did the math wrong. The third way solving for F does give the same answer. Never mind.

so i think what i did is right..

But what about this complexity? Let's say F were great enough for the top block to slip. How would I consider the forces in such a situation, given mu k and mu s?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


zhaos said:
Hi all, I am studying for an exam and changed a practice problem by putting the force on the bottom block (you'll see). I just wanted to check if my thinking is correct.

Homework Statement


Two blocks sit on top of each other, block 1 (m1) on top of block 2 (m2), on a frictionless surface. There is friction between the two blocks, coefficient of static friction mu. If a horizontal force, F, is applied to the block 2, what is the greatest magnitude of F that can be applied such that block 1 does not slip?

Homework Equations


Sum of forces = ma


The Attempt at a Solution


We mainly need to concern ourselves with the horizontal physics.
Is it valid that I consider the forces on block 2 and the forces on block 1?
Block 2: F - m1 * g * mu = m2 * a
Block 1: m1 * g * mu = m1 * a
Also, F = (m1 + m2)a

So then, I used equations for block 1 and block 2, to solve for F. I got F = g * mu (m1 + m2). Looks like F = (m1 + m2)a isn't very useful.

Is this the right reasoning and the right answer?

Perhaps the weird thing for me is that let's say I use the equation for block 2 and the equation F = (m1 + m2)a. If I substitute in (m1 + m2)a for F, then I can solve for a and get g * mu. If I substitute F / (m1+m2) for a, and solve for F, I get a much more complex expression [m1 * g * mu (m1 + m2)] / (m1 + 2*m2). I wonder if this is the same? It works out dimensionally, but not numerically if I choose random values for m1 and m2. What did I do wrong?

update again: oh oh. no I guess it's right, I did the math wrong. The third way solving for F does give the same answer. Never mind.

so i think what i did is right..
Yes, good. The extra equation serves as a good check that you did your work correctly when using the other 2 equations.
But what about this complexity? Let's say F were great enough for the top block to slip. How would I consider the forces in such a situation, given mu k and mu s?

Thanks.
In that case, the top block slips, so it will have a different acceleration with respect to the ground than the bottom block's acceleration with respect to the ground. The bottom block's acceleration with respect to the ground will depend on what the value of F is...the top block's acceleration with respect to the ground is independent of the value of F. What value would you use for friction, mu k or mu s?
Welcome to PF, zhaos!
 


Hi PhantomJay

Thanks for your reply. Since the block is slipping we would use mu k.
I think the situation is now..
F - muk * m1 g = m2 * a [for block 2]
and
muk * m1 g = m1 * a' [for block 1]
(a' not the same as a)
Ah so I see what you mean about a' being independent of F. Thanks.
 


Yes, that looks very good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K