How Can I Verify a Canonical Transformation Using the Poisson Bracket?

skrtic
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Verify that

q_bar=ln(q^-1*sin(p))

p_bar=q*cot(p)


* represents muliplication

sorry i don't know how to use the programming to make it look better



2. The attempt at a solution

my problem is that i really have no clue what is going on. I have read the section, reread the section, then looked on online just to try and find an example. I am much more of a visual learner so reading doesn't help all the time.

I guess I'm looking for some guidance of what/how to do. and not even this proble, but just an example or process.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a canonical transformation preserves the poission bracket

i.e the possion bracket of p and q: {q,p}_(p,q) = 1

thus if {q_bar, p_bar}_(p,q) = 1, then it is a canonical transformation.

(there are more ways to show it, like if there exists a generation function.. but I like the poission bracket the most, it is easy to remember)

The poission bracket is defined as
\left\lbrace f,g \right\rbrace _{(q,p)} = \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial q}\dfrac{\partial g}{\partial p} -\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial p}\dfrac{\partial g}{\partial q}
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top