How can kinetic energy and momentum be conserved in an elastic collision?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy in elastic collisions, with participants examining the mathematical relationships between the two conservation laws. There is confusion regarding the application of the equations and their equivalence in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the differences between the equations for momentum and kinetic energy, questioning their equivalence and applicability in solving problems related to elastic collisions. Some express confusion about how to reconcile the two equations when solving for unknown variables.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the use of the momentum and kinetic energy equations. Some participants suggest that both equations may be necessary for complex problems, while others emphasize the importance of understanding the context of the collision to determine which equation to prioritize.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equations involve vector and scalar quantities, which may contribute to the confusion. There is also mention of the assumption that energy is not converted into potential energy during the collision, which is relevant to the discussion of elastic collisions.

Hypercubes
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I must be overlooking something here. In an elastic collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved, right? The math is not making sense...

Homework Equations


Momentum is conserved:
m_{1}u_{1}+m_{2}u_{2}=m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2}

and kinetic energy is conserved:
\frac{m_1u_1^2}2+\frac{m_2u_2^2}2=\frac{m_1v_1^2}2+\frac{m_2v_2^2}2

The Attempt at a Solution


How is this possible? The two equations are not equivalent. If, for example, I solve for v2:
v_{2} = (m_{1}*u_{1} - m_{1}*v_{1} + m_{2}*u_{2})/m_{2}
with the first formula, but
v_{2} = \sqrt{(m_{1}*u_{1}^2/m_{2} - m_{1}*v_{1}^2/m_{2} + u_{2}^2)} with the second.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
obvoiudly the 2 eqn's are not same ... if they were same when what will be the use of 2 eqn's ? ...
if they were same ... you'll get(suppose) v = a+ 1 ... from eqn 1
and v = a+1 from 2 again ...

then how will they help solve your problem

like in math you get 2 eqn's ...
2a + 3b = 5
18a + 17b = 25 ... they will not give identical expression for a ... that's why you can solve for a,b
 
cupid.callin said:
obvoiudly the 2 eqn's are not same ... if they were same when what will be the use of 2 eqn's ? ...
if they were same ... you'll get(suppose) v = a+ 1 ... from eqn 1
and v = a+1 from 2 again ...

then how will they help solve your problem

like in math you get 2 eqn's ...
2a + 3b = 5
18a + 17b = 25 ... they will not give identical expression for a ... that's why you can solve for a,b
Well, often in physics equivalent equations are used for solving for different things.

Then which one should be used for elastic collisions?
 
Hypercubes said:
Well, often in physics equivalent equations are used for solving for different things.
like?

Hypercubes said:
Then which one should be used for elastic collisions?
both ... in some cases one might be enough but in complex questions you need to use both
 
I figured out the problem. There is only one value for which they are both equal, and this would only occur in a perfectly elastic collision. So for realistic collisions, the momentum one should be used.
 
-Simplify the problem by taking unit masses and cancelling the 1/2 factor.
v1+v2=u1+u2; v1^2+v2^2=u1^2+u2^2. Square the two sides of the first equation and subtract from the second and get; v1*v2=u1*u2 as a solution satisfying both conditions. This remains correct if the masses are not equal or the velocities are general vectors.
Of course we assume there is no change of energy into potential energy due to changes in position. This condition is satisfied only if the two come from far away and go back far away after their elastic collision.
 
Hypercubes said:
I figured out the problem. There is only one value for which they are both equal, and this would only occur in a perfectly elastic collision. So for realistic collisions, the momentum one should be used.

That is the way we work.

In EVERY collision, momentum is conserved. In elastic collisions energy is also conserved. If you are unsure of whether a collision is elastic - stick with the momentum equation.

Note, while the equations involved the same variables, The first one used the Vector velocities, where as the Energy equation only uses the speed - the magnitude of the velocity.

I one case, a change in direction is important - in the other it is not.
 
Hypercubes said:

Homework Statement


I must be overlooking something here. In an elastic collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved, right? The math is not making sense...


Homework Equations


Momentum is conserved:
m_{1}u_{1}+m_{2}u_{2}=m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2}

and kinetic energy is conserved:
\frac{m_1u_1^2}2+\frac{m_2u_2^2}2=\frac{m_1v_1^2}2+\frac{m_2v_2^2}2

The Attempt at a Solution


How is this possible? The two equations are not equivalent. If, for example, I solve for v2:
v_{2} = (m_{1}*u_{1} - m_{1}*v_{1} + m_{2}*u_{2})/m_{2}
with the first formula, but
v_{2} = \sqrt{(m_{1}*u_{1}^2/m_{2} - m_{1}*v_{1}^2/m_{2} + u_{2}^2)} with the second.

Thanks in advance!

m_{1}\vec u_{1}+m_{2}\vec u_{2}=m_{1}\vec v_{1} + m_{2}\vec v_{2}

\frac{m_1|u_1|^2}2+\frac{m_2|u_2|^2}2=\frac{m_1|v_1|^2}2+\frac{m_2|v_2|^2}2

One is vector and the other is scalar.
Velocity 5m/s going north is not equal to 5m/s going south.
For scalar both are identical.

\vec v_{2} \ne |v_{2}|
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
959
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K