How can the bound states of two spin 1/2 particles be split into two equations?

kreil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
665
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


Two spin 1/2 particles interact through the spin-dependent potential

V(r)=V_1(r)+V_2(r) \sigma ^{(1)} \cdot \sigma^{(2)}

Show that the equation determining the bound states can be split into two equations, one having the effective potential V_1(r)+V_2(2) and the other V_1(r)-3V_2(r).

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm really having trouble figuring out how to solve these spin problems, but I think for this one I should use the Schrodinger equation for two particles?

\left [ \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\left ( \nabla_1^2+\nabla_2^2 \right ) + V(r) \right ] |s,m \rangle = E |s,m\rangle

If so, I need to figure out how to quantify \sigma ^{(1)} \cdot \sigma^{(2)}, which I am unsure how to do.

In addition to this specific problem, any more general remarks/resources about how to solve these spin problems would be appreciated (my book is terrible in this respect)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably saw this trick when calculating the spin-orbit interaction for the hydrogen atom. For this problem, the total spin S is equal to S=S1+S2. If you square this equation, you get

\mathbf{S}^2 = (\mathbf{S}_1+\mathbf{S}_2)^2 = \mathbf{S}_1^2+\mathbf{S}_2^2+2\mathbf{S}_1\cdot\mathbf{S}_2

Solving for the cross term, you get

\mathbf{S}_1\cdot\mathbf{S}_2 = \frac{\mathbf{S}^2-\mathbf{S}_1^2-\mathbf{S}_2^2}{2}
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top