How can the Higgs Boson induce mass?

Mukilab
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
How can the Higgs boson induce mass?
How can it interact with itself? Is it the only particle able to do so, if yes, why, and if no, what other particles can interact with themselves?

As a side thought, is Young's Double Slit Experiment evidence of particles interacting with themselves (the electron as a wave entering both slits simultaneously)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What we sometimes call "the Higgs" is really two things: a constant background field h0 and a Higgs boson: quantum excitations of that field. It's the Higgs field that is believed to be responsible for the masses of the fermions (electrons, neutrinos, quarks) along with the gauge fields W and Z. These masses could have been put into the theory by hand, but not without violating a fundamental principle, electroweak gauge invariance. What the Higgs field does is to allow these terms in a gauge invariant way.

Other particles that interact with themselves are gluons and gravitons.
 
Bill_K said:
What we sometimes call "the Higgs" is really two things: a constant background field h0 and a Higgs boson: quantum excitations of that field. It's the Higgs field that is believed to be responsible for the masses of the fermions (electrons, neutrinos, quarks) along with the gauge fields W and Z. These masses could have been put into the theory by hand, but not without violating a fundamental principle, electroweak gauge invariance. What the Higgs field does is to allow these terms in a gauge invariant way.

Other particles that interact with themselves are gluons and gravitons.

So how is the higgs boson related to the higgs field/is it related at all?

What do you mean by quantum excitations of the field? Surely every particle would 'excite' the field at any level since it has mass and gravity.

Thank you for the quick answer by the way :)
 
Mukilab said:
So how is the higgs boson related to the higgs field/is it related at all?

What do you mean by quantum excitations of the field? Surely every particle would 'excite' the field at any level since it has mass and gravity.

Consider photons. Photons are the quantum versions of electromagnetic waves, which are ripples in the electromagnetic field. It's possible to have a constant background electromagnetic field, for example the one created by a permanent magnet. Then if you jiggle around some charges somewhere, you will create ripples in the electromagnetic field on top of whatever constant field is already there. These ripples travel as electromagnetic waves, which are described quantum mechanically in terms of photon particles. We could say that photons are the "quantum excitations" of the electromagnetic field.

It's the same with the Higgs. There is a Higgs field that is very much like the electromagnetic field, and in the universe there is a constant background Higgs field. If you jiggle massive particles around in the right way, you can create ripples in the Higgs field which travel as waves, and which are described quantum mechanically as particles called Higgs bosons. We say that Higgs bosons are the "quantum excitations" of the Higgs field.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top