A How can the LRS model for leptons incorporate the Standard Model group?

Shen712
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
This is a homework problem in a course in particle physics at Cornell University.
Assume the Left Right Symmetric (LRS) model for leptons. The gauge group is GLR = SU(2)L×SU(2)R×U(1)X. The Standard Model group SU(2)L×U(1)Y has to be included in the LRS group. Namely, U(1)Y ⊂ SU(2)R×U(1)X. Find the linear combination of the LRS generators which gives the Standard Model generator Y.
The answer is: Y = T3R + X/2
How to get this result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To give away the answer directly would violate Physics Forums rules. What are your own thoughts and what have you been able to conclude so far?
 
Orodruin said:
To give away the answer directly would violate Physics Forums rules. What are your own thoughts and what have you been able to conclude so far?

My thoughts are: Since the SM generator Y is proportional to identity, the required linear combination of the LRS generators must also be proportional to identity. Considering that the generators of SU(2)R are TaR = τa/2, where τa are the Pauli matrices, only the combination of T3R and X is possible to be proportional to identity. Thus, Y = T3R + kX, where k is some constant. Since TaR = τa/2, if we take k = 1/2, we will get Y = τa/2 + X/2 = diag(1+X, -1+X)/2. This is a diagonalized matrix, but not proportional to identity. I am a little puzzled.
By the way, I am not a student at Cornell University, and this course is an old one in 2008. I just downloaded the course materials from the website and study them by myself. In this case, do the Physics Forum rules allow to give away the answer?
 
Shen712 said:
In this case, do the Physics Forum rules allow to give away the answer?
No. We believe that regardless of whether you're doing an exercise as part of a course for credit, or for independent self-study, you're best served by figuring out the answer for yourself, with some help from hints and/or corrections as appropriate.
 
I suppose that since you are looking at models beyond the standard model, you have already looked at the standard model itself... haven't you?
If yes, the problem is pretty much the same as the EM charge in the Electroweak theory: SU_L(2) \times U_Y(1) \rightarrow U_{Q}(1).
 
  • Like
Likes nikkkom
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top