How Can the Rocketeer Safely Catch the Falling Student from the CN Tower?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ali Asadullah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
Ali Asadullah
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
A real challenge to all physicsist!

In order to experience free fall a student walks off the top of the CN Tower which is 553m high and falls freely. His initial velocity is zero. The rocketeer arrives at the scene 5 seconds later and dives off the top of the tower to save the student. The rocketeer leaves the roof with an initial downward speed v0. in order both to get the student and to prevent injury to him the rocketeer should catch the student at a sufficiently great height above ground so that the rocketeer and the student slow down and arrive at the ground with zero velocity. The upward acceleration that accomplish this is provided by the rocketeer's jet pack. which is turned on just as he catch the student. Before then the rocketeer is in free fall. To prevent discomfort to the student the magnitude of the acceleration of rocketeer and the student as they move downward together should be no more that 5 times g. What is the minimum height above the ground at which the rocketeer should catch the student? What must be the rocketeer's initial downward speed so that he catch the student at the minimum height found above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ali! :wink:

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top