How can two cylindrical lenses can be used to form a laser sheet?

AI Thread Summary
Two cylindrical lenses can be utilized to create a laser sheet by first expanding a laser beam into a line using one lens, followed by a second lens to further expand the line into a two-dimensional area. This method resembles a one-dimensional telescope design, focusing on minimizing divergence in one axis. However, using two cylindrical lenses may introduce aberrations, affecting the quality of the laser sheet. For specific applications, such as laser diode collimators, lenses with varying focal lengths can effectively manage different divergences in the two axes. Understanding the differences between a "laser line" and a "laser sheet" is crucial for proper lens configuration.
photonlz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
If you look at the below link under 'Laser Sheet', https://www.edmundoptics.com/campaigns/cylinder-lens/

The equation is much easier for a single line generator. I am stuck at the point where I use a second lens. Say for the sheet, input beam dia is 5mm and working distance L is 100mm, I use 'x = (d/EFL) (L + EFL)' for the 1st lens, then at which distance from the 1st lens do I keep the 2nd lens and how do I choose the FL of the 2nd lens. And how to use 'x = (d/EFL) (L + EFL)' for the 2nd lens (especially about the L part).
Relevant Equations
x = (d/EFL) (L + EFL)
Would you be able to help me figure out the equation to be used at both lenses to get the final light sheet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your question. What is the difference between a "laser line" and a "laser sheet"?

I guess you want a finite laser line at the target with essentially no divergence? For this you need to design a telescope, except in only 1 dimension. It's the same as a normal (2-D) telescope, except with aligned cylindrical lenses so one axis isn't ever modified. Search for something like "telescope design", or maybe "beam expander".
 
https://opentextbc.ca/universityphysicsv3openstax/chapter/microscopes-and-telescopes/
 
DaveE said:
I don't understand your question. What is the difference between a "laser line" and a "laser sheet"?
I think since you can use a cylindrical lens to expand a beam into a line (say in the y-direction), he would like to use a 2nd cylindrical lens that the line hits to expand it into a 2-D illumination area (in both the x- and y-directions). Seems like you'd get a lot of aberration content by doing that though...
 
berkeman said:
I think since you can use a cylindrical lens to expand a beam into a line (say in the y-direction), he would like to use a 2nd cylindrical lens that the line hits to expand it into a 2-D illumination area (in both the x- and y-directions). Seems like you'd get a lot of aberration content by doing that though...
You can do that with a conventional (circularly symmetric lens), I think. Unless you want different divergence in the two axis. For example, laser diode collimators use lenses that are a combination of two cylindrical lenses (one piece of glass, normally) with different focal lengths in the two axes. This allows collimation of the fast and slow axis of the beam, which have different divergence.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top