How can we accurately compare air flow data in an open system?

AI Thread Summary
Normalizing air flow data in an open system involves adjusting for varying temperatures and pressures to enable accurate comparisons across different datasets. The current approach uses a specific equation to normalize flow data, but the challenge lies in addressing the variability of line pressure during tests. The user seeks clarification on whether additional calculations are necessary to account for this variability before applying the normalization equation. Concerns are raised about the accuracy of the normalized values when derived from data generated under different conditions. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the normalization process in producing reliable comparisons remains uncertain due to the fluctuating parameters involved.
xXDeltaXx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question relating to normalizing air flow data in an open system…

The system comprises of a regulator feeding 2barg line pressure to a valve (controlling the downstream flow), a variable restriction, a second valve (normally open) and a flow meter. Pressure readings are taken upstream and downstream of the restriction – these generate the line pressure and differential pressure readouts.

Because of the layout, the restriction in the pipe work generates backpressure as the flow increases – as such, a ‘0 barg’ test can end up with 1 barg of line pressure…

We apply a calculation to the data to ‘normalize’ it at the generated temperatures and pressures.
This is the equation to normalize the data used: QN = Q × (Pa / Pref) × (Tref / T) - sourced from
The problem is that we wish to compare the data to other data sets on a uniform scale (set temperature and set pressure)…
As the generated data is produced with a variable line pressure, I presume that another calculation is needed to remove this variability before entering the uniform values into the normalizing calculation…??

For example:
I wish to compare the following data at 0.5barg line pressure and 15°C to create a flow curve
0 l/min, 0mbar dP at 0barg line pressure, 10°C
20 l/min, 226mbar dP at 0.2bar line pressure, 9°C
42 l/min, 502mbar dP at 0.38bar line pressure, 9°C
The equation can be applied to each line – generating a ‘normalized’ value.
The desired conditions can be applied to each line – generating ‘normalized’ values… but would these really be accurate for comparison as the dP was generated with different line pressures?

(I'm finding this a little difficult to explain exactly what I mean...)

Thanks for your time :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hopefully this will explain a little better...

http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/5466/query1.jpg
(Illustrative results)
The actual data shows an increase in line pressure and a decrease in temperature during the test where the flow rate and differential pressure are recorded.
The ideal conditions are set at a static temperature and line pressure.
The Nm3/hr in each data table shows the difference changing these values makes.

My query is: because the temperature and line pressure recorded are not static, are the generated results accurate? Or does the calculation work regardless as each point is individually converted? - the fact that the data is part of a data set and across different temperatures and pressures does not matter...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top