How Can You Calculate Cliff Height Using Sound?

  • Thread starter Thread starter babbagee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the height of a cliff using sound, a rock is dropped, and the total time until the sound reaches the top is 10 seconds. The equations used include h = 0.5gt² for the rock's fall and ts = h/vsound for the sound's travel time. By combining these equations, the total time can be expressed as ttotal = sqrt(2h/g) + h/vsound. The initial calculations yielded incorrect heights of -1086.9m and -14130.43m, but the correct height is closer to 380m. Verifying the arithmetic is crucial for accurate results in such problems.
babbagee
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
here is the question

Cliff Height. You are climbing in the High Sierra where you suddenly find yourself at the edge of a fog-shrouded cliff. To find the height of this cliff, you drop a rock from the top and 10.0 s later hear the sound of it hitting the ground at the foot of the cliff.

Ignoring air resistance, how high is the cliff if the speed of sound is 330 m/s

ok i did the problem and i just wanted at least to people to check my work.


h = .5gt2

time for sound to reach the person
ts = h/vsound


since the total time is ten seconds then i can solve both equations for time
time for rock to hit ground
t = sqrt(2h/g)
time for sound to travel up to the person
t = h/vsound

then ttotal = sqrt(2h/g) + h/vsound

then i can solve for h.

I got -1086.9m and -14130.43m

can at least two people confirm that. The reason i am asking is because I am doing my homework online and i have one more try to get it right, so i want to make sure I got it right.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your arithmetic for the quadratic.

The answer is closer to 380 m - which you can check by substituting it into the expression you already had - ttotal = sqrt(2h/g) + h/vsound - it's correct.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top